Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:826-831

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tchou, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tchou, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow CPR and emergency cardiac care
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 1999;100:826-831.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Fully Discharging Phases

A New Approach to Biphasic Waveforms for External Defibrillation

Yoshio Yamanouchi, MD; James E. Brewer, MS; Kenneth F. Olson, BS; Kent A. Mowrey, MS; Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD; Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD; Patrick J. Tchou, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, and SurVivaLink Corp, Minneapolis, Minn (J.E.B., K.F.O.).

Correspondence to Patrick J. Tchou, MD, Director, Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology/F15, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail tchoup{at}cesmtp.ccf.org

Background—Phase-2 voltage and maximum pulse width are dependent on phase-1 pulse characteristics in a single-capacitor biphasic waveform. The use of 2 separate output capacitors avoids these limitations and may allow waveforms with lower defibrillation thresholds. A previous report also suggested that the optimal tilt may be >70%. This study was designed to determine an optimal biphasic waveform by use of a combination of 2 separate and fully (95% tilt) discharging capacitors.

Methods and Results—We performed 2 external defibrillation studies in a pig ventricular fibrillation model. In group 1, 9 waveforms from a combination of 3 phase-1 capacitor values (30, 60, and 120 µF) and 3 phase-2 capacitor values (0=monophasic, 1/3, and 1.0 times the phase-1 capacitor) were tested. Biphasic waveforms with phase-2 capacitors of 1/3 times that of phase 1 provided the highest defibrillation efficacy (stored energy and voltage) compared with corresponding monophasic and biphasic waveforms with the same capacitors in both phases except for waveforms with a 30-µF phase-1 capacitor. In group 2, 10 biphasic waveforms from a combination of 2 phase-1 capacitor values (30 and 60 µF) and 5 phase-2 capacitor values (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 µF) were tested. In this range, phase-2 capacitor size was more critical for the 30-µF phase-1 than for the 60-µF phase-1 capacitor. The optimal combinations of fully discharging capacitors for defibrillation were 60/20 and 60/30 µF.

Conclusions—Phase-2 capacitor size plays an important role in reducing defibrillation energy in biphasic waveforms when 2 separate and fully discharging capacitors are used.


Key Words: defibrillation • death, sudden • ventricles




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. P. Marenco, P. J. Wang, M. S. Link, M. K. Homoud, and N. A. M. Estes III
Improving Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The Role of the Automated External Defibrillator
JAMA, March 7, 2001; 285(9): 1193 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]