Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:924-932

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Supino, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hochreiter, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Supino, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hochreiter, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 1999;100:924-932.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Prognostication in 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Exercise

Influence of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Phyllis G. Supino, EdD; Jeffrey S. Borer, MD; Edmund M. Herrold, MD, PhD; Clare Hochreiter, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, The Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, The New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.

Background—Previous data indicate that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) provides prognostic information among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but the value of such testing specifically for defining benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may relate to severity of exercise-inducible ischemia measured noninvasively before surgery.

Methods and Results—To determine the independent prognostic importance of preoperative ischemia severity for predicting outcomes of CABG among patients with extensive CAD, we monitored 167 stable patients with angiographically documented 3-vessel CAD (average follow-up of 9 years in event-free patients) who previously had undergone rest and exercise radionuclide cineangiography. Their course was correlated with data obtained during initial radionuclide testing, coronary arteriography, and clinical evaluation at study entry. Fifty-two patients received medical treatment only, and 115 underwent CABG (44 early [<=1 month after initial study]). Multivariate Cox model analysis indicated that change ({Delta}) in LVEF from rest to exercise during radionuclide study was the strongest independent predictor of major cardiac events (P=0.003) before surgery and also predicted magnitude of CABG benefit (P=0.04). Patients with {Delta}LVEF -8% or less derived significant survival-prolonging and event-reducing benefit from CABG performed <=1 month after initial testing (P<0.02 for cardiac death and P=0.008 for cardiac events], early CABG versus medical-treatment-only patients); similar benefits were absent among patients with {Delta}LVEF more than -8%, and among those in whom CABG was deferred.

Conclusions—Assessment of ischemia severity based on LVEF response to exercise enables effective prognostication among patients with 3-vessel CAD and defines the likelihood of life-prolonging and event-reducing benefits from CABG.


Key Words: prognosis • ischemia • coronary disease • grafting