Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:1067-1074

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, G. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, G. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery

(Circulation. 2000;101:1067.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Current Perspective

Economic Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Marshall S. Stanton, MD; Gregory K. Bell, PhD

From Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn, and Charles River Associates Inc, Boston, Mass (G.K.B.).

Background—We reviewed the literature pertaining to the cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in the management of ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia. Discussed are the methodology, advantages, and limitations of economic-outcomes analyses as related to ICD therapy; the impact of new technology and physician practice patterns; and methodological recommendations for future studies.

Methods and Results—Articles published between 1990 and 1997 were screened for cost-effectiveness analyses of ICD versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and economic models were included. These studies report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from cost savings of $13 975 per life-year saved (LYS) to an incremental cost of $114 917 per LYS for ICD therapy. Differences were due to study type, cost-reporting methodology, ICD technology used, and length of follow-up. Assuming current technology and physician practice patterns, we find that ICD total therapy costs may break even in 1 to 3 years.

Conclusions—Recent literature suggests that ICDs are a cost-effective therapy for management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The advent of new technology and patient management practices should further improve the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy. Future studies of ICD cost-effectiveness should address the implications of truncated follow-up periods and quality of life.


Key Words: cost-benefit analysis • cardioversion • defibrillation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
H. M. Spotnitz
Surgical Implantation of Pacemakers and Automatic Defibrillators
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1395 - 1428.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. M. Feldman, G. de Lissovoy, M. R. Bristow, L. A. Saxon, T. De Marco, D. A. Kass, J. Boehmer, S. Singh, D. J. Whellan, P. Carson, et al.
Cost Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2311 - 2321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. S. Stanton
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: An Excellent Case Study
Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 52 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
H. M. Spotnitz
Pacemakers and Automatic Defibrillators
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1293 - 1326.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Nisam and J. Farre
Is prophylaxis the best use of the ICD?
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2002; 23(9): 700 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. V. Exner, G. J. Klein, and E. N. Prystowsky
Primary Prevention of Sudden Death With Implantable Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Cardiac Disease: Can We Afford to Do It? (Can We Afford Not To?)
Circulation, September 25, 2001; 104(13): 1564 - 1570.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G Boriani, M Biffi, C Martignani, M Gallina, and A Branzi
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2001; 22(12): 990 - 996.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. P. DiMarco
Is programmed stimulation in survivors of myocardial infarction helpful?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1908 - 1909.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Jaffe, W. M. Landau, R. D. Wetzel, W. J. Groh, M. E. Salive, L. D. Richardson, The Public Access Defibrillation Trial Investigato, R. E. Fried, M. Bassan, T. D. Valenzuela, et al.
Automated External Defibrillators
N. Engl. J. Med., March 8, 2001; 344(10): 771 - 773.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
S. Nisam
A Prophylactic ICD? Who are the patients? What is the device?
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(4): 269 - 274.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A.J Camm and S Nisam
The Utilization of the Implantable Defibrillator--a European Enigma
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2000; 21(24): 1998 - 2004.
[PDF]