(Circulation. 2000;102:1427.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity and Transmural Perfusion Gradient by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography
Comparison of Gray-Scale B-Mode With Power Doppler Imaging
From the Cardiovascular Division (H.M., B.C., B.P., A.N.D.), University of California at San Diego, and the Second Department of Internal Medicine (K.O., K.M.), Kagawa Medical University, Kagawa, Japan.
Correspondence to Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, Cardiovascular Division, UCSD Medical Center, 200 West Arbor St, San Diego, CA 92103-8411. E-mail ademaria{at}ucsd.edu
Background—The present study (1) compared the ability of power Doppler imaging with that of gray-scale B-mode tissue imaging to opacify the myocardium and detect coronary stenosis by myocardial contrast echocardiography and (2) compared the response of video intensity (VI) to variable pulsing intervals for each modality.
Methods and Results—Four grades of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenoses were created in 9 open-chest dogs. Stenoses reduced resting LAD flow by 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of baseline by flow probe. Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed during varying ECG gated pulsing intervals (PIs) from 1:1 to 1:10. By gray-scale imaging, background-subtracted LAD bed VI was less than baseline VI at all PIs for the 100% reduced-flow state but not for any other flow state or interval. By power Doppler imaging, LAD bed VI was less than baseline VI at all intervals for 75% and 100% reduced-flow states but only 1:1 and 1:2 for 25% and 50% reduced-flow states, respectively. Correlation of VI and myocardial blood flow (determined by use of fluorescent microspheres) ratios from stenosed versus normal beds was stronger by power Doppler imaging. A transmural opacification gradient with stenosis was visualized and measured by power Doppler imaging, but it was insignificant by gray-scale imaging. The ratio of endocardial/epicardial flow determined by use of fluorescent microspheres was correlated with VI by power Doppler imaging at all PIs.
Conclusions—Power Doppler imaging has advantages compared with gray-scale imaging in opacifying the myocardium and in detecting coronary stenosis and altered transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion from peak VI. Because VI differences from baseline at long PI vary for mild versus severe (75% and 100%, respectively) reduced-flow states, power Doppler imaging may provide a method to quantify coronary stenoses.
Key Words: echocardiography • perfusion • blood flow
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D. L. Miller, M. A. Averkiou, A. A. Brayman, E. C. Everbach, C. K. Holland, J. H. Wible Jr, and J. Wu Bioeffects Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound Contrast Agents J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 611 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Dijkmans, R. Senior, H. Becher, T. R. Porter, K. Wei, C. A. Visser, and O. Kamp Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion: The Evidence So Far J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 8, 2006; (2006) j.jacc.2006.05.079v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y Abe, T Muro, Y Sakanoue, R Komatsu, M Otsuka, T Naruko, A Itoh, M Yoshiyama, K Haze, and J Yoshikawa Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts regional and global left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1578 - 1583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Yamada, K Komuro, T Mikami, N Kudo, H Onozuka, K Goto, S Fujii, K Yamamoto, and A Kitabatake Novel quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging during myocardial contrast echocardiography Heart, February 1, 2005; 91(2): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Yano, H. Ito, K. Iwakura, R. Kimura, K. Tanaka, A. Okamura, S. Kawano, T. Masuyama, and K. Fujii Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viabilityin patients with myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1799 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Hagendorff, A Goeckritz, A Neugebauer, T Rother, T Linke, D Pfeiffer, and H Becher Assessment of Regional Myocardial Hypoperfusion with Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Using Intravenous Bolus Application in Patients with Acute Chest Pain: A Double Case Report Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 320 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Takagi, K. Ohmori, K. Yukiiri, I. Kondo, Y. Yu, A. Oshita, H. Takeuchi, K. Mizushige, and M. Kohno Quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis by harmonic power Doppler with a simple pulsing sequence and vasodilator stress in patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2060 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Masugata, N. Fujita, I. Kondo, B. Peters, K. Ohmori, K. Mizushige, M. Kohno, and A. N. DeMaria Assessment of right ventricular perfusion after right coronary artery occlusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 21, 2003; 41(10): 1823 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Muro, T Hozumi, H Watanabe, H Yamagishi, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography Heart, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 145 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Fukuda, T Muro, T Hozumi, H Watanabe, K Shimada, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Changes in transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion assessed by quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans Heart, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 368 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Agati, S. Funaro, M. Madonna, C. Volponi, G. Veneroso, and G. Tonti Clinical utility of contrast echocardiography in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C27 - C34. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Masugata, S. Lafitte, B. Peters, G. M. Strachan, and A. N. DeMaria Comparison of Real-Time and Intermittent Triggered Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography for Quantification of Coronary Stenosis Severity and Transmural Perfusion Gradient Circulation, September 25, 2001; 104(13): 1550 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. S. Villanueva, E. W. Gertz, M. Csikari, G. Pulido, D. Fisher, and J. Sklenar Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis With Power Doppler Imaging Circulation, May 29, 2001; 103(21): 2624 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|