Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:1517-1522

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, D.
Right arrow Articles by Clémenty, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, D.
Right arrow Articles by Clémenty, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 2000;102:1517.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Differential Pacing for Distinguishing Block From Persistent Conduction Through an Ablation Line

Presented in part at the 19th annual meeting of the NASPE, San Diego, Calif, May 6–9, 1998.

Dipen Shah, MD; Michel Haïssaguerre, MD; Atsushi Takahashi, MD; Pierre Jaïs, MD; Mélèze Hocini, MD; Jacques Clémenty, MD

From the Département de Rythmologie, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Correspondence to Dr Dipen C. Shah, Département de Rythmologie, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Avenue de Magellan, 33604 Bordeaux-Pessac, France. E-mail jacques.clementy{at}pu.u-bordeaux2.fr

Background—Because complete linear conduction block is necessary to minimize the recurrence of reentrant tachycardias such as typical atrial flutter, we investigated a simple technique to recognize a persistent gap or complete linear block.

Methods and Results—We prospectively evaluated cavotricuspid isthmus conduction in 50 patients (age 63±8 years, 43 men) after radiofrequency ablation. The distal and proximal bipoles of a quadripolar catheter placed close to the ablation line were successively stimulated during recording from the ablation line. We hypothesized that because the initial and terminal components of local potentials reflected activation at the ipsilateral and contralateral borders of the ablation lesion, a change to a more proximal pacing site without moving the catheter would prolong the stimulus to the initial component timing, whereas the response of the terminal component would depend on the presence of block or persistent conduction. A shortening or no change in timing of the terminal component would indicate block, whereas lengthening would indicate persistent gap conduction. The results were compared with previously described criteria for isthmus block. Ninety-two sites were assessed: 17 before and 75 after the achievement of complete isthmus block. The timing of the initial component was delayed by 19±9 ms, and the terminal component was advanced by 13±8 ms after block and delayed by 12±9 ms in case of persisting conduction. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for linear block were 100%, 75%, 94%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions—An accurate assessment of isthmus block or persistent isthmus conduction is possible with this technique of differential pacing.


Key Words: conduction • cavotricuspid isthmus • pacing maneuver




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Y. Ishii, T. Nitta, M. Kambe, J. Kurita, M. Ochi, Y. Miyauchi, and K. Shimizu
Intraoperative verification of conduction block in atrial fibrillation surgery.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 998 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Knecht, M. Hocini, M. Wright, N. Lellouche, M. D. O'Neill, S. Matsuo, I. Nault, V. S. Chauhan, K. J. Makati, M. Bevilacqua, et al.
Left atrial linear lesions are required for successful treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2008; 29(19): 2359 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Maury, A. Duparc, A. Hebrard, M. El Bayomy, and M. Delay
Prevalence of typical atrial flutter with reentry circuit posterior to the superior vena cava: Use of entrainment at the atrial roof
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 190 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M C S Hall and D M Todd
Modern management of arrhythmias
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2006; 82(964): 117 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Laurent, C. De Chillou, Gér. Bertaux, I. M. Poull, A. Martel, M. Andronache, S.ép. Fromentin, M. Fraison, S.ép. Gonzalez, F.ço. S. Pierre, et al.
Simple and efficient identification of conduction gaps in post-ablation recurring atrial flutters.
Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 7 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Hocini, P. Jais, P. Sanders, Y. Takahashi, M. Rotter, T. Rostock, L.-F. Hsu, F. Sacher, S. Reuter, J. Clementy, et al.
Techniques, Evaluation, and Consequences of Linear Block at the Left Atrial Roof in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Study
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3688 - 3696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. D. Bella, S. Riva, G. Fassini, M. Casella, C. Carbucicchio, N. Trevisi, M. Berti, F. Giraldi, and G. Maccabelli
Long-term follow-up after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Role of the acute procedure outcome and of the clinical presentation
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(2): 95 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Jais, M. Hocini, L.-F. Hsu, P. Sanders, C. Scavee, R. Weerasooriya, L. Macle, F. Raybaud, S. Garrigue, D. C. Shah, et al.
Technique and Results of Linear Ablation at the Mitral Isthmus
Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 2996 - 3002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y.-J. Lin, C.-T. Tai, J.-L. Huang, T.-Y. Liu, P.-C. Lee, C.-T. Ting, and S.-A. Chen
Characteristics of virtual unipolar electrograms for detecting isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 16, 2004; 43(12): 2300 - 2304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Scavee, P. Jais, L.-F. Hsu, P. Sanders, M. Hocini, R. Weerasooriya, L. Macle, F. Raybaud, J. Clementy, and M. Haissaguerre
Prospective randomised comparison of irrigated-tip and large-tip catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2004; 25(11): 963 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O. Wazni, N. F. Marrouche, D. O. Martin, A. M. Gillinov, W. Saliba, E. Saad, A. Klein, M. Bhargava, D. Bash, R. Schweikert, et al.
Randomized Study Comparing Combined Pulmonary Vein-Left Atrial Junction Disconnection and Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein-Left Atrial Junction Disconnection Alone in Patients Presenting With Typical Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, November 18, 2003; 108(20): 2479 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Andronache, C. de Chillou, H. Miljoen, I. Magnin-Poull, M. Messier, P. Dotto, D. Beurrier, T. Doan, P. Houriez, A. Bineau-Jorisse, et al.
Correlation between electrogram morphology and standard criteria to validate bidirectional cavotricuspid block in common atrial flutter ablation
Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(4): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]