This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abe, M. Articles by Doba, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Abe, M. Articles by Doba, N. Related Collections Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC Other diagnostic testing

(Circulation. 2000;102:2365.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Moderate Coronary Artery Stenoses

Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve

Masayuki Abe, MD; Hirofumi Tomiyama, MD; Hideo Yoshida, MD; Nobutaka Doba, MD

From the Cardiovascular Center (M.A.) and Division of Cardiology (H.T., H.Y., N.D.), Third Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Ichihara Hospital, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan.

Correspondence to Masayuki Abe, MD, Cardiovascular Center, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Ichihara Hospital, 3426-3 Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan 299-0111. E-mail cao02110{at}pop02.odn.ne.jp

Background—Coronary blood flow occurs mainly during the diastolic phase of each cardiac cycle and is mainly dependent on diastolic driving pressure, especially in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). We hypothesized that calculation of the ratio of the diastolic driving pressure of a stenotic LAD to its normal value, namely diastolic FFR (d-FFR), might provide precise insight into the mechanism of FFR for assessment of the functional severity of the stenosis. We compared d-FFR with FFR, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and exercise myocardial thallium scintigraphy in an lesion of intermediate severity.

Methods and Results—The study population consisted of 46 consecutive patients with a moderate stenosis in the LAD in whom simultaneous measurements of aortic pressure, left ventricular pressure, and coronary pressure distal to the stenosis were obtained. Coronary flow velocity was successfully measured with a Doppler guidewire in 37 of the 46 patients. Values for FFR, d-FFR, and CFR in the noninvasive test–positive group were significantly lower than those in the negative group. With cutoff values of 0.75, 0.76, and 2.0 for FFR, d-FFR, and CFR, sensitivities were 83.3%, 95.8%, and 88.2% and specificities were 100%, 100%, and 95.0%, respectively.

Conclusions—The close similarity of the sensitivity and specificity of FFR and d-FFR, around almost identical cutoff values (0.75 versus 0.76), confirms the physiological validity of FFR as a clinical standard. In clinical practice, FFR remains the index of choice for assessment of the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses.

Key Words: ischemia • coronary artery disease • hemodynamics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J.-W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, E. Eeckhout, W. F. Fearon, S. T. Higano, M. J. Lim, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1321 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Legalery, F. Schiele, M.-F. Seronde, N. Meneveau, H. Wei, K. Didier, M.-C. Blonde, F. Caulfield, and J.-P. Bassand One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2005; 26(24): 2623 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Pereztol-Valdes, J. Candell-Riera, C. Santana-Boado, J. Angel, S. Aguade-Bruix, J. Castell-Conesa, E. V. Garcia, and J. Soler-Soler Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteries Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2005; 26(24): 2637 - 2643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Escaned, J. Cortes, A. Flores, J. Goicolea, F. Alfonso, R. Hernandez, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, M. Sabate, C. Banuelos, and C. Macaya Importance of diastolic fractional flow reserve and dobutamine challenge in physiologic assessment of myocardial bridging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 226 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. J. Pijls Is it time to measure fractional flow reserve in all patients? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 2, 2003; 41(7): 1122 - 1124. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Werner, M. Ferrari, B. M. Richartz, O. Gastmann, and H. R. Figulla Microvascular Dysfunction in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Circulation, September 4, 2001; 104(10): 1129 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. De Bruyne, N. H.J. Pijls, J. Bartunek, K. Kulecki, J.-W. Bech, H. De Winter, P. Van Crombrugge, G. R. Heyndrickx, and W. Wijns Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction Circulation, July 10, 2001; 104(2): 157 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, N. H.J. Pijls, E. D. de Muinck, J. C.A. Hoorntje, J. Escaned, P. R. Stella, E. Boersma, J. Bartunek, J. J. Koolen, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis : A Randomized Trial Circulation, June 19, 2001; 103(24): 2928 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]