(Circulation. 2000;102:3028.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communication |
From Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy, and the Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Siegburg, Germany (E.G.).
Correspondence to Antonio Colombo, MD, Centro Cuore Columbus, Via M. Buonarroti, 48, I-20145, Milan, Italy. E-mail columbus{at}micronet.it
BackgroundCoronary perforation is a life-threatening complication of percutaneous interventions. In the past few years, the implantation of covered stents has emerged as a strategy for treatment when the traditional conservative approach (ie, prolonged balloon inflation and reversal of anticoagulation) fails.
Methods and ResultsSince May 1997 (when polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]-covered stents were available at our institutions), 11 of the 12 consecutive patients who had coronary ruptures that were unsuccessfully sealed with prolonged balloon inflation and reversal of anticoagulation were treated with 12 PTFE-covered stents (PTFE group). The efficacy of the PTFE-covered stent was compared with that of noncovered stents, which were used to treat 17 perforations (non-PTFE group). One patient sustained a very distal perforation that was not suitable for covered stent sealing and underwent emergency surgery. All vessel ruptures treated with PTFE-covered stent implantation were successfully sealed. The time necessary to deploy the stent was 10±3 minutes (range, 4 to 15 minutes). All patients but one were discharged from the hospital and had an optimal early clinical outcome. One patient underwent emergency bypass surgery and died in the intensive care unit. The occurrence of cardiac tamponade and the necessity for emergency surgery was significantly lower in the PTFE group than in the non-PTFE group. At 14±4 months, the 10 discharged patients had not experienced any major adverse cardiac events.
ConclusionsThis preliminary study supports the utility of the PTFE-covered stent for the nonsurgical treatment of vessel ruptures.
Key Words: angioplasty coronary disease hemorrhage stents
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Wilson and J. T. Willerson Myocardial Revascularization with Percutaneous Devices Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 573 - 598. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.M. van Opstal, G. Geskes, F. Eerens, S. Aydin, and J. Vainer Venous graft perforation leading to cardiac tamponade Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 162 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Bittl Reducing the Risk of Emergency Bypass Surgery for Failed Percutaneous Coronary Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2010 - 2012. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Airoldi, C Di Mario, G Stankovic, C Briguori, M Carlino, A Chieffo, F Liistro, M Montorfano, P Pagnotta, V Spanos, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome of directional atherectomy followed by stent implantation in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1050 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo, G. Stankovic, and J. W. Moses Selection of coronary stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1021 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Singh, H. H. Ting, P. B. Berger, K. N. Garratt, D. R. Holmes Jr, and B. J. Gersh Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1881 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |