This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lafitte, S. Articles by DeMaria, A. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lafitte, S. Articles by DeMaria, A. N. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques

(Circulation. 2001;103:2724.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Basic Science Reports

Comparative Value of Dobutamine and Adenosine Stress in the Detection of Coronary Stenosis With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

Stéphane Lafitte, MD; Hisashi Matsugata, MD; Barry Peters, MD; Mario Togni, MD; Monet Strachan, RDCS; Oi Ling Kwan, RDCS; Anthony N. DeMaria, MD

From the Cardiovascular Division, University of California at San Diego.

Correspondence to Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, Cardiovascular Division, UCSD Medical Center, 200 W Arbor St, San Diego, CA 92103-8411. E-mail ademaria{at}ucsd.edu

Background—Controversy continues as to whether adenosine or dobutamine is the superior pharmacological stress agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE).

Methods and Results—We compared real-time MCE refilling curves and wall thickening during adenosine and dobutamine stress in 14 open-chest dogs with left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary artery stenoses that reduced hyperemia by 40% to 60% and 70% to 90% (mild and severe non–flow-limiting stenosis, NFLS) and resting flow by 10% to 30% and 35% to 50% (mild and severe flow-limiting stenosis, FLS). MCE was performed with low-energy imaging during Optison infusion. After high-energy bubble destruction, time-intensity data from risk beds were fitted for an exponential function as y=A(1-e^-bt), from which the rate of intensity increase (b) and maximal plateau intensity (A) were derived. Although severe NFLS and greater stenoses decreased b with both dobutamine and adenosine, with mild NFLS it was reduced in 58% of animals with dobutamine versus 8% with adenosine. The absolute decrease in b, however, was greater for adenosine than dobutamine with FLS. The A parameter was decreased with both adenosine and dobutamine only with the most severe FLS. Wall thickening was decreased with dobutamine in 33% of animals with severe NFLS and in all animals with any FLS; with adenosine, in all with severe FLS.

Conclusions—Both dobutamine and adenosine significantly reduce MCE refilling rates in the setting of severe stenosis and in the absence of contractile abnormalities. Dobutamine decreases refilling rate and wall thickening at a less reduced flow grade than adenosine, but adenosine produces a greater magnitude of change than dobutamine.

Key Words: contrast media • stress • echocardiography • dobutamine • adenosine

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Raher, H. Thibault, K. K. Poh, R. Liu, E. F. Halpern, G. Derumeaux, F. Ichinose, W. M. Zapol, K. D. Bloch, M. H. Picard, et al. In Vivo Characterization of Murine Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Validation and Application in Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 Deficient Mice Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1250 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Winter, P. Gudmundsson, and R. Willenheimer Real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography in the coronary care unit: a feasible bedside tool for predicting coronary artery stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2005; 6(1): 31 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Croteau, F. Benard, M. Bentourkia, J. Rousseau, M. Paquette, and R. Lecomte Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Reserve in Rats with 13N-Ammonia and Small Animal PET: Impact of Anesthesia and Pharmacologic Stress Agents J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1924 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Bin, R. A. Pelberg, K. Wei, D. E. Le, N. C. Goodman, and S. Kaul Dobutamine versus dipyridamole for inducing reversible perfusion defects in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 3, 2002; 40(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. t. Lafitte, A. Higashiyama, H. Masugata, B. Peters, M. Strachan, O. i L. Kwan, and A. N. DeMaria Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1546 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Becher, K. Tiemann, S. Kuntz-Hehner, H. Omran, and T. Schlosser Diagnostic impact of contrast echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C12 - C21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Wei, E. Le, A. R. Jayaweera, J.-P. Bin, N. C. Goodman, and S. Kaul Detection of Noncritical Coronary Stenosis at Rest Without Recourse to Exercise or Pharmacological Stress Circulation, January 15, 2002; 105(2): 218 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Leong-Poi, S.-J. Rim, D. E. Le, N. G. Fisher, K. Wei, and S. Kaul Perfusion Versus Function: The Ischemic Cascade in Demand Ischemia: Implications of Single-Vessel Versus Multivessel Stenosis Circulation, February 26, 2002; 105(8): 987 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]