Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;111:2958-2965
Published online before print May 31, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512475
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
111/22/2958    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512475v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balakrishnan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balakrishnan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, E. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

(Circulation. 2005;111:2958-2965.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Interventional Cardiology

Strut Position, Blood Flow, and Drug Deposition

Implications for Single and Overlapping Drug-Eluting Stents

Brinda Balakrishnan, SB*; Abraham R. Tzafriri, PhD*; Philip Seifert, MS; Adam Groothuis, MS; Campbell Rogers, MD; Elazer R. Edelman, MD, PhD

From the Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (B.B., A.R.T., P.S., A.G., C.R., E.R.E.), and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.R., E.R.E.).

Correspondence to Dr E.R. Edelman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 16-343, Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail ere{at}mit.edu

Received September 7, 2004; de novo received October 6, 2004; revision received February 11, 2005; accepted February 28, 2005.

Background— The intricacies of stent design, local pharmacology, tissue biology, and rheology preclude an intuitive understanding of drug distribution and deposition from drug-eluting stents (DES).

Methods and Results— A coupled computational fluid dynamics and mass transfer model was applied to predict drug deposition for single and overlapping DES. Drug deposition appeared not only beneath regions of arterial contact with the strut but surprisingly also beneath standing drug pools created by strut disruption of flow. These regions correlated with areas of drug-induced fibrin deposition surrounding DES struts in porcine coronary arteries. Fibrin deposition immediately distal to individual isolated drug-eluting struts was twice as great as in the proximal area and for the stent as a whole was greater in distal segments than proximal segments. Adjacent and overlapping stent struts increased computed arterial drug deposition by far less than the sum of their combined drug load. In addition, drug eluted from the abluminal stent strut surface accounted for only 11% of total deposition, whereas, remarkably, drug eluted from the adluminal surface accounted for 43% of total deposition. Thus, local blood flow alterations and location of drug elution on the strut were far more important in determining arterial wall drug deposition and distribution than were drug load or arterial wall contact with coated strut surfaces.

Conclusions— Simulations that coupled strut configurations with flow dynamics correlated with in vivo effects and revealed that drug deposition occurs less via contact between drug coating and the arterial wall than via flow-mediated deposition of blood-solubilized drug.


Key Words: drugs • hemodynamics • restenosis • stents




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Carter
Drug-eluting stent fracture promise and performance.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 17, 2009; 54(21): 1932 - 1934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. E. Drachman
Drug-Eluting Stents in Animals and Patients: Where Do We Stand Today?
Circulation, July 14, 2009; 120(2): 101 - 103.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
R. S. Schwartz, E. Edelman, R. Virmani, A. Carter, J. F. Granada, G. L. Kaluza, N. A.F. Chronos, K. A. Robinson, R. Waksman, J. Weinberger, et al.
Drug-Eluting Stents in Preclinical Studies: Updated Consensus Recommendations for Preclinical Evaluation
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2008; 1(2): 143 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
J. Aoki, G. S. Mintz, N. J. Weissman, J. T. Mann, L. Cannon, J. Greenberg, E. Grube, A.R. Z. Masud, J. Koglin, L. Mandinov, et al.
Chronic Arterial Responses to Overlapping Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Insights From Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analyses in the TAXUS-V and -VI Trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. V. Finn, G. Nakazawa, M. Joner, F. D. Kolodgie, E. K. Mont, H. K. Gold, and R. Virmani
Vascular Responses to Drug Eluting Stents: Importance of Delayed Healing
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2007; 27(7): 1500 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]