Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:2786-2791
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.553727
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, H. V.
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, H. V.
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease

(Circulation. 2005;112:2786-2791.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Coronary Heart Disease

Relationship Between Procedure Indications and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force Guidelines

H. Vernon Anderson, MD; Richard E. Shaw, PhD; Ralph G. Brindis, MD; Lloyd W. Klein, MD; Charles R. McKay, MD; Michael A. Kutcher, MD; Ronald J. Krone, MD; Michael J. Wolk, MD; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD; William S. Weintraub, MD

From the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Tex (H.V.A.); Sutter Pacific Heart Center, San Francisco, Calif (R.E.S.); Kaiser Permanente Health System, Oakland, Calif (R.G.B.); Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ill (L.W.K.); Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif (C.R.M.); Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC (M.A.K.); Washington University, St Louis, Mo (R.J.K.); Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (M.J.W.); University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (S.C.S.); and Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (W.S.W.).

Correspondence to H. Vernon Anderson, MD, Cardiology Division, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, 6431 Fannin, Suite 1.246, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail h.v.anderson{at}uth.tmc.edu

Received April 4, 2005; revision received July 11, 2005; accepted July 12, 2005.

Background— An American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Task Force periodically revises and publishes guidelines with evidence-based recommendations for appropriate use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Some studies have suggested that closer adherence to guidelines can reduce variations in care, can improve quality, and may ultimately result in better outcomes, but this finding is incompletely understood. Guidelines themselves must change to be responsive to continuously evolving clinical practice. Our goal here was to investigate whether any relationship existed between the most recent ACC/AHA recommended indications for PCI and short term in-hospital outcomes.

Methods and Results— We analyzed the ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry for the period of January 1, 2001, through March 31, 2004. We excluded PCI procedures performed for acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction); all others were grouped by their indications according to the standard ACC/AHA scheme: Class I, evidence and/or agreement that PCI is useful and effective; Class IIa, conflicting evidence and/or divergent opinions, weight is in favor; Class IIb, usefulness/efficacy is less well established; and Class III, evidence and/or agreement that PCI is not useful or effective and may be harmful. Clinical success was defined as angiographic success (<20% residual stenosis) at all lesions attempted without the adverse events of myocardial infarction, same-admission bypass surgery, or death. There were 412 617 PCI procedures included in the analysis. Frequency of indications was as follows: Class I, 64%; Class IIa, 21%; Class IIb, 7%; and Class III, 8%. Clinical success declined across the indications classes (92.8%, 91.7%, 89%, and 85.5%, respectively; P<0.001), whereas adverse events increased.

Conclusions— In this large survey of contemporary PCI practice, most procedures were performed for Class I indications. A significant relationship between evidence-based indications recommended by the ACC/AHA Task Force and in-hospital outcomes was noted.


Key Words: angioplasty • coronary disease • mortality • registries • stents




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
G. J. Dehmer and R. G. Brindis
Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated at Hospitals With and Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery: What Is the Important Point?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 953 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. Tricoci, J. M. Allen, J. M. Kramer, R. M. Califf, and S. C. Smith Jr
Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines
JAMA, February 25, 2009; 301(8): 831 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. A. Lin, R. A. Dudley, F. L. Lucas, D. J. Malenka, E. Vittinghoff, and R. F. Redberg
Frequency of Stress Testing to Document Ischemia Prior to Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
JAMA, October 15, 2008; 300(15): 1765 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. H. Corbett
Ethical issues, justification, referral criteria for budget limited and high-dose procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 1, 2008; 130(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Moscucci
Behavioral Factors, Bias, and Practice Guidelines in the Decision to Use Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Arch Intern Med, August 13, 2007; 167(15): 1573 - 1575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. J. Kostis, K. Demissie, S. W. Marcella, Y.-H. Shao, A. C. Wilson, A. E. Moreyra, and the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System
Weekend versus Weekday Admission and Mortality from Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., March 15, 2007; 356(11): 1099 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. S. Douglas and R. G. Brindis
President's Page: A Question of Quality: Why National Benchmarking?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 7, 2006; 47(5): 1076 - 1078.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. G. Brindis and G. J. Dehmer
Continuous Quality Improvement in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Are the Benefits Worth the Cost and Effort?
Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 767 - 770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. R. Holmes Jr, P. Hodgson, and M. Singh
Guidelines, Lighthouses, and a Toe in the Water
Circulation, November 1, 2005; 112(18): 2754 - 2755.
[Full Text] [PDF]