Published online before print September 11, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.607655
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;114:1277-1284.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Imaging |
Clinical Utility and Safety of a Protocol for Noncardiac and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillators at 1.5 Tesla
From Johns Hopkins Hospital, Departments of Cardiology/Medicine (S.N., A.R., M.M.Z., A.C.L., T.L.D., H.C., R.G.W., R.D.B., D.A.B., H.R.H.), Radiology (A.C.L., D.A.B., H.R.H.), Surgery (A.C.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (A.C.L., H.R.H.), Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to Saman Nazarian, MD, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Carnegie 568, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail snazari1{at}jhmi.edu
Received December 11, 2005; revision received June 1, 2006; accepted June 6, 2006.
Background— Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important diagnostic modality currently unavailable for millions of patients because of the presence of implantable cardiac devices. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic utility and safety of noncardiac and cardiac MRI at 1.5T using a protocol that incorporates device selection and programming and limits the estimated specific absorption rate of MRI sequences.
Methods and Results— Patients with no imaging alternative and with devices shown to be MRI safe by in vitro phantom and in vivo animal testing were enrolled. Of 55 patients who underwent 68 MRI studies, 31 had a pacemaker, and 24 had an implantable defibrillator. Pacing mode was changed to "asynchronous" for pacemaker-dependent patients and to "demand" for others. Magnet response and tachyarrhythmia functions were disabled. Blood pressure, ECG, oximetry, and symptoms were monitored. Efforts were made to limit the system-estimated whole-body average specific absorption rate to 2.0 W/kg (successful in >99% of sequences) while maintaining the diagnostic capability of MRI. No episodes of inappropriate inhibition or activation of pacing were observed. There were no significant differences between baseline and immediate or long-term (median 99 days after MRI) sensing amplitudes, lead impedances, or pacing thresholds. Diagnostic questions were answered in 100% of nonthoracic and 93% of thoracic studies. Clinical findings included diagnosis of vascular abnormalities (9 patients), diagnosis or staging of malignancy (9 patients), and assessment of cardiac viability (13 patients).
Conclusions— Given appropriate precautions, noncardiac and cardiac MRI can potentially be safely performed in patients with selected implantable pacemaker and defibrillator systems.
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. Boye and J. Schumacher Diagnosis of vertebral canal haematoma by myelography and spiral computer tomography in a patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 137 - 138. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Aliot, W. G. Stevenson, J. M. Almendral-Garrote, F. Bogun, C. H. Calkins, E. Delacretaz, P. D. Bella, G. Hindricks, P. Jais, M. E. Josephson, et al. EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 771 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F Alpendurada, J Wong, and D J Pennell Practical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Heart Asia, March 31, 2009; 2009(3): 16 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Nazarian, D. A. Bluemke, and H. R. Halperin Applications of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Electrophysiology Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 63 - 71. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Nazarian, A. Kolandaivelu, M. M. Zviman, G. R. Meininger, R. Kato, R. C. Susil, A. Roguin, T. L. Dickfeld, H. Ashikaga, H. Calkins, et al. Feasibility of Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Catheter Guidance in Electrophysiology Studies Circulation, July 15, 2008; 118(3): 223 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Roguin, J. Schwitter, C. Vahlhaus, M. Lombardi, J. Brugada, P. Vardas, A. Auricchio, S. Priori, and T. Sommer Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 336 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Dickfeld, P. Lei, V. Dilsizian, J. Jeudy, J. Dong, A. Voudouris, R. Peters, M. Saba, R. Shekhar, and S. Shorofsky Integration of three-dimensional scar maps for ventricular tachycardia ablation with positron emission tomography-computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 73 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. N. Levine, A. S. Gomes, A. E. Arai, D. A. Bluemke, S. D. Flamm, E. Kanal, W. J. Manning, E. T. Martin, J. M. Smith, N. Wilke, et al. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Circulation, December 11, 2007; 116(24): 2878 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Kramer, M. J. Budoff, Z. A. Fayad, V. A. Ferrari, C. Goldman, J. R. Lesser, E. T. Martin, S. Rajagopalan, J. P. Reilly, G. P. Rodgers, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2007; 12(4): 359 - 378. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Kramer, M. J. Budoff, Z. A. Fayad, V. A. Ferrari, C. Goldman, J. R. Lesser, E. T. Martin, S. Rajagopalan, J. P. Reilly, G. P. Rodgers, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Vascular Imaging With Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 11, 2007; 50(11): 1097 - 1114. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chalil, B. Stegemann, S. Muhyaldeen, K. Khadjooi, R. E.A. Smith, P. J. Jordan, and F. Leyva Intraventricular Dyssynchrony Predicts Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Study Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Tissue Synchronization Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 243 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Can Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices Safely Undergo MRI? Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, October 20, 2006; 2006(1020): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. P. Faris and M. Shein Food and Drug Administration Perspective: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1232 - 1233. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|