This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 114/18/1940    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.106.641779v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pacella, J. J. Articles by Villanueva, F. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pacella, J. J. Articles by Villanueva, F. S. Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques Imaging Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2006;114:1940-1947.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Imaging

Effect of Coronary Stenosis on Adjacent Bed Flow Reserve

Assessment of Microvascular Mechanisms Using Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

John J. Pacella, MS, MD; Flordeliza S. Villanueva, MD

From the Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Correspondence to Flordeliza S. Villanueva, MD, University of Pittsburgh, S568 Scaife Hall, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail villanuevafs{at}msx.upmc.edu

Received May 24, 2006; revision received August 22, 2006; accepted September 1, 2006.

Background— During coronary stenosis, flow reserve in the adjacent nonstenotic bed decreases, but the microvascular mechanisms are unknown. Because myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) assesses microvascular physiology, we used it to relate flow reserve to intramyocardial blood volume in the adjacent bed.

Methods and Results— A noncritical left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis was created in 10 dogs. MCE was performed and myocardial blood flow was measured with neutron-activated microspheres and flow probes. Data were collected at baseline, hyperemia, and hyperemia and stenosis. Hyperemia was induced with an A_2A receptor agonist. MCE acoustic intensity in the LAD and left circumflex (LCx) regions were fit to the following: y=A(1-e^–ßt), where A, ß, and Axß reflect intramyocardial blood volume, red cell velocity, and flow, respectively. During hyperemia alone, LCx probe and microsphere flows and MCE-derived red cell velocity increased from baseline (30±14 versus 125±62 mL/min, P<0.0005; 1.5±0.5 versus 6.6±2.0 mL · min^–1 · g^–1, P<0.0005; and 0.53±0.14 versus 0.96±0.45 second^–1, P=0.030, respectively); intramyocardial blood volume was unchanged. LAD stenosis during hyperemia decreased LCx probe flow (125±62 versus 110±57 mL/min; P<0.05), microsphere flow (6.6±2.0 versus 4.2±2.1 mL · min^–1 · g^–1; P<0.0005), and MCE-derived flow (0.57±0.29 versus 0.45±0.33 second^–1; P=0.032). LCx bed intramyocardial blood volume concurrently increased (0.61±0.14 versus 0.70±0.15; P<0.01).

Conclusions— Coronary stenosis impairs flow reserve in the adjacent nonstenotic bed, in which intramyocardial blood volume increases. MCE suggests compensatory recruitment of microvascular anastomotic collateral networks that augment stenotic bed flow reserve, but at the expense of the adjacent bed. Adjacent bed collateral microcirculation thus participates in the regulation of collateral flow and appears functionally significant during coronary stenosis.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. E. Weyman The Year in Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2007; 49(11): 1212 - 1219. [Full Text] [PDF]