Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:191-195
Published online before print July 10, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621896
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
114/3/191    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621896v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Marchlinski, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Marchlinski, F. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 2006;114:191-195.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients Referred for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Response to Ablation That Incorporates Slow-Pathway Modification

William H. Sauer, MD; Concepcion Alonso, MD; Erica Zado, PA-C; Joshua M. Cooper, MD; David Lin, MD; Sanjay Dixit, MD; Andrea Russo, MD; Ralph Verdino, MD; Sen Ji, MD; Edward P. Gerstenfeld, MD; David J. Callans, MD; Francis E. Marchlinski, MD

From the Electrophysiology Section, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pa. Dr Sauer is currently at the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo.

Correspondence to Francis E. Marchlinski, MD, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail francis.marchlinski{at}uphs.upenn.edu

Received February 21, 2006; revision received May 5, 2006; accepted May 12, 2006.

Background— Although the most common sites of atrial ectopy that trigger atrial fibrillation (AF) are in or around the pulmonary veins (PVs), atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can also cause or coexist with AF. We sought to characterize patients with AF and AVNRT and assess clinical outcomes after ablation.

Methods and Results— To determine the prevalence of concomitant AVNRT and AF, 629 consecutive patients referred for catheter ablation between November 1998 and March 2005 were studied. Electrophysiological studies with programmed stimulation during isoproterenol infusion identified atrial ectopy that initiated AF and the presence of inducible AVNRT. AF ablation consisted of proximal isolation of PVs and elimination of any non-PV trigger of AF, including AVNRT. There were 27 patients (4.3%) who had inducible AVNRT at the time of AF ablation. Of these, 13 underwent AVNRT ablation without PV isolation. Compared with the rest of the cohort, patients with AVNRT and AF were younger at the time of symptom onset (age 36.8±13.8 versus 48.2±11.7 years; P<0.01). Freedom from AF with or without previously ineffective antiarrhythmic medication was similar in both groups (96.3% versus 90.7%; mean follow-up 21.4±9.4 months); however, patients with AVNRT targeted for ablation were more likely to be AF free while not taking any antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure during the follow-up period (87.5% versus 54.7%; P<0.01) and had fewer complications (0% versus 2.5%; P=0.30). Twelve of the 13 patients who underwent slow-pathway ablation without left atrial ablation remained AF free without the need for antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure.

Conclusions— AVNRT is an uncommon AF trigger seen more frequently in younger patients. Ablation of AVNRT in patients with AF was associated with improved outcomes compared with those with other triggers of AF.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. L. Waldo and G. K. Feld
Inter-Relationships of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 26, 2008; 51(8): 779 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
D. G. Katritsis, E. Giazitzoglou, M. A. Wood, R. K. Shepard, B. Parvez, and K. A. Ellenbogen
Inducible supraventricular tachycardias in patients referred for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 785 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al.
HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society.
Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379.
[Full Text] [PDF]