Published online before print May 14, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.661082
(Circulation. 2007;115:2613-2620.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Congenital Heart Disease |
Diagnostic Miscues in Congenital Long-QT Syndrome
From the Department of Pediatrics/Division of Pediatric Cardiology (N.W.T., C.M.H., M.J.A.), Department of Medicine/Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (C.M.H., D.J.T., M.J.A.), and Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics (C.M.H., D.J.T., M.J.A.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD, Long QT Syndrome Clinic and Mayo Clinic Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Guggenheim 501, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail ackerman.michael{at}mayo.edu
Received August 26, 2006; accepted March 5, 2007.
Background— Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is a potentially lethal cardiac channelopathy that can be mistaken for palpitations, neurocardiogenic syncope, and epilepsy. Because of increased physician and public awareness of warning signs suggestive of LQTS, there is the potential for LQTS to be overdiagnosed. We sought to determine the agreement between the dismissal diagnosis from an LQTS subspecialty clinic and the original referral diagnosis.
Methods and Results— Data from the medical record were compared with data from the outside evaluation for 176 consecutive patients (121 females, median age 16 years, average referral corrected QT interval [QTc] of 481 ms) referred with a diagnosis of LQTS. After evaluation at Mayo Clinic’s LQTS Clinic, patients were categorized as having definite LQTS (D-LQTS), possible LQTS (P-LQTS), or no LQTS (No-LQTS). Seventy-three patients (41%) were categorized as No-LQTS, 56 (32%) as P-LQTS, and only 47 (27%) as D-LQTS. The yield of genetic testing among D-LQTS patients was 78% compared with 34% for P-LQTS and 0% among No-LQTS patients (P<0.0001). The average QTc was greater in either D-LQTS or P-LQTS than in No-LQTS (461 versus 424 ms, P<0.0001). Vasovagal syncope was more common among the No-LQTS subset (28%) than the P-LQTS/D-LQTS group (8%; P=0.04). Determinants for discordance (ie, positive outside diagnosis versus No-LQTS) included overestimation of QTc, diagnosing LQTS on the basis of "borderline" QTc values, and interpretation of a vasovagal fainting episode as an LQTS-precipitated cardiac event.
Conclusions— Diagnostic concordance was present for less than one third of the patients who sought a second opinion. Two of every 5 patients referred with the diagnosis of LQTS departed without such a diagnosis. Miscalculation of the QTc, misinterpretation of the normal distribution of QTc values, and misinterpretation of symptoms appear to be responsible for most of the diagnostic miscues.
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  C. I. Berul Congenital Long-QT Syndromes: Who's at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death? Circulation, April 29, 2008; 117(17): 2178 - 2180. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Lindberg, C. J. Lindsell, and R. A. Shapiro Variability in Expert Assessments of Child Physical Abuse Likelihood Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): e945 - e953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Roden Long-QT Syndrome N. Engl. J. Med., January 10, 2008; 358(2): 169 - 176. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. N. Viswanathan and R. L. Page Short QT: When Does It Matter? Circulation, August 14, 2007; 116(7): 686 - 688. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|