| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;115:3181-3188.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology |
From Istituto di Cardiologia (A. Marzocchi, F.S.), Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy; Unità Operativa di Cardiologia (G. Piovaccari), Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini, Italy; Unità Operativa di Cardiologia Interventistica (A. Manari), Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Divisione di Cardiologia (E.A.), Ospedale Maggiore, Parma, Italy; Laboratorio di Emodinamica (A.B.), Hesperia Hospital, Modena, Italy; Casa di cura Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital (A.C.), Cotignola (Ra), Italy; Laboratorio di Emodinamica (G. Percoco), Ospedale di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; Unità Operativa di CardiologiaCentro Interventistico (E.V., A. Maresta), Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy; Nuovo Ospedale S. Agostino (P.M.), Modena, Italy; and Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale Regione Emilia-Romagna Bologna (P.G., R.G.), Bologna, Italy.
Correspondence to Francesco Saia, MD, PhD, Catheterization Laboratory, Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi (Pad 21), Via Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. E-mail francescosaia{at}hotmail.com
Received September 29, 2006; accepted April 13, 2007.
Background The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) have been questioned recently.
Methods and Results Between July 2002 and June 2005, 10 629 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with either DES (n=3064) or bare-metal stents (BMS, n=7565) were enrolled in a prospective registry comprising 13 hospitals. We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) and angiographic stent thrombosis during 2-year follow-up. A propensity score analysis to adjust for different baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics was performed. The 2-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 17.8% in the DES group and 21.0% in the BMS group (P=0.003 by log-rank test). Angiographic stent thrombosis was 1.0% in the DES group and 0.6% in the BMS group (P=0.09). After adjustment, the 2-year cumulative incidence of death was 6.8% in the DES group and 7.4% in the BMS group (P=0.35), whereas the rates were 5.3% in DES and 5.8% in BMS for acute myocardial infarction (P=0.46), 9.1% in DES and 12.9% in BMS for target-vessel revascularization (P<0.00001), and 16.9% in DES and 21.8% in BMS for major adverse cardiac events (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of target-vessel revascularization in the DES group were diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.76), renal failure (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.69), and reference vessel diameter (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93).
Conclusions In this large real-world population, the beneficial effect of DES in reducing the need for new revascularization compared with BMS extends to 2 years without evidence of a worse safety profile.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Malenka, A. V. Kaplan, F. L. Lucas, S. M. Sharp, and J. S. Skinner Outcomes Following Coronary Stenting in the Era of Bare-Metal vs the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents JAMA, June 25, 2008; 299(24): 2868 - 2876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Anderson Drug-Eluting Stents: Life Insurance With a Better Death Benefit J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2025 - 2027. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mauri and S.-L. T. Normand Studies of Drug-Eluting Stents: To Each His Own? Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2047 - 2050. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines, J. A. Goldstein, and R. D. Safian Should We Routinely Use Drug-Eluting Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction?: Let's Wait and See J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 136 - 138. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brinker The left main facts: faced, spun, but alas too few. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 893 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ortolani, M. Balducelli, P. Marzaroli, G. Piovaccari, A. Menozzi, V. Guiducci, P. Sangiorgio, F. Tarantino, G. Geraci, F. Castriota, et al. Two-Year Clinical Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Stents for Diabetic Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions: Results From a Real-World Multicenter Registry Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 923 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Saia, A. Marzocchi, and A. Branzi Review: The safety of drug-eluting stents Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 43 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Buttner and F.-J. Neumann Peeling-Off Labels: Mounting Evidence for Benefit of Drug-Eluting Stents With Off-Label Use J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2037 - 2038. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |