This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 115/7/881    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634436v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gammie, J. S. Articles by Peterson, E. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gammie, J. S. Articles by Peterson, E. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Surgery Related Collections CV surgery: valvular disease Related Article

(Circulation. 2007;115:881-887.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cardiovascular Surgery

Influence of Hospital Procedural Volume on Care Process and Mortality for Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation

James S. Gammie, MD; Sean M. O’Brien, PhD; Bartley P. Griffith, MD; T. Bruce Ferguson, MD; Eric D. Peterson, MD

From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (J.S.G., B.P.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md; Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.M.O., E.D.P.), Durham, NC; and Brody School of Medicine at Eastern Carolina University (T.B.F.), Greenville, NC.

Correspondence to James S. Gammie, MD, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, N4W94, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201. E-mail jgammie{at}smail.umaryland.edu

Received May 1, 2006; accepted November 3, 2006.

Background— Few studies have examined the procedural volume–outcome relationship for heart valve surgery. None have examined process of care factors that may be mediators of this association.

Methods and Results— This was a retrospective review of outcomes for 13 614 patients having elective surgery for mitral regurgitation between 2000 and 2003 in 575 North American centers participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Hospital annual mitral valve volume varied widely from 22 cases per year in the lowest-volume quartile to 394 in the highest. Unadjusted mortality rates decreased from 3.08% in the lowest-volume category to 1.11% in the highest-volume category. The risk-adjusted odds ratio for mortality in the highest-volume category compared with the lowest was 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.82). The rates of mitral valve repair increased from 47.7% in the lowest-volume quartile to 77.4% in high-volume hospitals (P<0.0001). Similarly, the rates of bioprosthetic valve use for patients aged >65 years rose from 59% in the lowest-volume quartile to 75% in the highest-volume quartile (P=0.0002). The association between volume and mortality was still significant but attenuated when the risk adjustment was modified to adjust for mitral valve repair versus replacement.

Conclusions— Hospital procedural volume was associated with higher frequency of valve repair, higher frequency of prosthetic valve usage in elderly patients, and lower adjusted operative mortality. Differences in care process may contribute to improved outcomes in higher-volume centers.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2007 115: 819. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Carey, J. P. Parker, C. Brandeau, and Z. Li The "occasional open heart surgeon" revisited. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1254 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Rahimtoola The Year in Valvular Heart Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 760 - 770. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Shuhaiber and H. Shuhaiber Letter Regarding Article by Gammie et al, "Influence of Hospital Procedural Volume on Care Process and Mortality for Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation" Circulation, August 14, 2007; 116(7): e146 - e146. [Full Text] [PDF]