Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:497-505
Published online before print July 16, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Circulation: July 31, 2007, Volume 116, Number 5
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/5/497    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lietz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lietz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy

(Circulation. 2007;116:497-505.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Heart Failure

Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy in the Post-REMATCH Era

Implications for Patient Selection

Katherine Lietz, MD, PhD; James W. Long, MD, PhD; Abdallah G. Kfoury, MD; Mark S. Slaughter, MD; Marc A. Silver, MD; Carmelo A. Milano, MD; Joseph G. Rogers, MD; Yoshifumi Naka, MD, PhD; Donna Mancini, MD; Leslie W. Miller, MD

From the Cardiovascular and Cardiothoracic Divisions of University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (K.L., L.W.M.); Georgetown University–Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (K.L., L.W.M.); LDS Hospital, Salt Late City, Utah (J.W.L., A.G.K.); Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Ill (M.S.S., M.A.S.); Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M., J.G.R.); and Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (Y.N., D.M.). Dr Lietz is now affiliated with the Division of Cardiology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Katherine Lietz, MD, PhD, Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Division of Cardiology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, PH-12 Stem Rm 134, 622 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032. E-mail KL2384{at}columbia.edu

Received January 25, 2007; revision received May 8, 2007.

Background— The landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial first demonstrated that implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) can provide survival superior to any known medical treatment in patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for transplantation. In the present study, we describe outcomes of DT in the post-REMATCH era in the United States.

Methods and Results— The present study included 280 patients who underwent HeartMate XVE LVAD implantation between November 2001 and December 2005. A preoperative risk score for in-hospital mortality after LVAD implantation was established in 222 patients with complete data. All patients were followed up until death or December 2006. The 1-year survival after LVAD implantation was 56%. The in-hospital mortality after LVAD surgery was 27%. The main causes of death included sepsis, right heart failure, and multiorgan failure. The most important determinants of in-hospital mortality were poor nutrition, hematological abnormalities, markers of end-organ or right ventricular dysfunction, and lack of inotropic support. Stratification of DT candidates into low (n=65), medium (n=111), high (n=28), and very high (n=18) risk on the basis of the risk score calculated from these predictors corresponded with 1-year survival rates of 81%, 62%, 28%, and 11%, respectively.

Conclusions— Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of DT. Patients with advanced heart failure who are referred for DT before major complications of heart failure develop have the best chance of achieving an excellent 1-year survival with LVAD therapy.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Struber, K. Sander, J. Lahpor, H. Ahn, P.-Y. Litzler, S. G. Drakos, F. Musumeci, C. Schlensak, I. Friedrich, R. Gustafsson, et al.
HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 289 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. H. Jones
The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1707 - 1718.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. W. Miller, F. D. Pagani, S. D. Russell, R. John, A. J. Boyle, K. D. Aaronson, J. V. Conte, Y. Naka, D. Mancini, R. M. Delgado, et al.
Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation
N. Engl. J. Med., August 30, 2007; 357(9): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. A. Hunt
Mechanical Circulatory Support: New Data, Old Problems
Circulation, July 31, 2007; 116(5): 461 - 462.
[Full Text] [PDF]