This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 117/12/1545    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.107.737841v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Sagristà-Sauleda, J. Articles by Permanyer-Miralda, G. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sagristà-Sauleda, J. Articles by Permanyer-Miralda, G. Related Collections Other heart failure Other Treatment Related Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:1545-1549.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Heart Failure

Hemodynamic Effects of Volume Expansion in Patients With Cardiac Tamponade

Jaume Sagristà-Sauleda, MD; Juan Angel, MD; Antonia Sambola, MD; G. Permanyer-Miralda, MD

From Servei de Cardiologia, hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron (J.S.-S., J.A., A.S., G.P.-M.) and Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) (G.P.-M), Barcelona, Spain.

Correspondence to Dr Jaime Sagristá Sauleda, Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, P. Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail jsagrist{at}vhebron.net

Received September 18, 2007; accepted January 23, 2008.

Background— Volume expansion has been proposed as an alternative treatment for cardiac tamponade; however, the scientific evidence for this recommendation is very poor.

Methods and Results— Forty-nine unselected patients (23 males; age 55±16 years) with large pericardial effusion and hemodynamic tamponade underwent fluid overload with intravenous administration of 500 mL of normal saline over 10 minutes. Cardiac index and intrapericardial, left ventricular end-diastolic, right atrial, and right ventricular end-diastolic pressures were measured during basal state (tamponade), after fluid overload, and after pericardiocentesis. Twenty-eight patients (57%) had physical signs of tamponade, and 10 (20%) were hypotensive. Size of pericardial effusion was 31±13 mm. Initial mean arterial pressure was 88±21 mm Hg, and cardiac index was 2.46±0.80 L · min^–1 · m^–2. Intrapericardial pressure was 8.31±5.98 mm Hg. Volume expansion caused a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (from 88±21 to 94±23 mm Hg, P=0.003) and cardiac index (from 2.46±0.80 to 2.64±0.68 L · min^–1 · m^–2, P=0.013), as well as in intrapericardial pressure (from 8.31±5.98 to 11.02±6.27 mm Hg, P=0.0001), right atrial pressure (from 9.76±5.91 to 12.82±6.34 mm Hg, P=0.0001), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (from 14.21±5.97 to 19.48±6.19 mm Hg, P=0.0001). Cardiac index increased by >10% in 23 patients (47%), remained unchanged in 11 (22%), and decreased in 15 (31%). No patient developed clinical complications. Predictors of this favorable response were systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg and low cardiac index.

Conclusions— Approximately one half of patients with cardiac tamponade develop a significant increase in cardiac output after volume overload. Low systolic blood pressure (<100 mm Hg) at baseline was the simplest clinical finding that was predictive of this favorable response.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1499. [Full Text]