Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:2502-2509
Published online before print April 21, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752113
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/19/2502    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752113v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow patientINFORMation
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jneid, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jneid, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Thrombolysis
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;117:2502-2509.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Health Services and Outcomes Research

Impact of Time of Presentation on the Care and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Hani Jneid, MD; Gregg C. Fonarow, MD; Christopher P. Cannon, MD; Igor F. Palacios, MD; Teoman Kilic, MD; George V. Moukarbel, MD; Andrew O. Maree, MD; Kenneth A. LaBresh, MD; Li Liang, PhD; L. Kristin Newby, MD; Gerald Fletcher, MD; Laura Wexler, MD; Eric Peterson, MD, MPH, for the Get With the Guidelines Steering Committee and Investigators

From the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (H.J., I.F.P., T.K., G.V.M., A.O.M.); UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (G.C.F.); TIMI Group and BWH, Boston, Mass (C.P.C.); Masspro, Inc, Waltham, Mass (K.A.L.); Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (L.L., L.K.N., E.P.); Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (G.F.); and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (L.W.).

Correspondence to Hani Jneid, MD, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRB 800 Boston, MA 02114. E-mail jneid.hani{at}mgh.harvard.edu

Received November 13, 2007; accepted March 13, 2008.

Background— Prior studies have demonstrated an inconsistent association between patients’ arrival time for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and their subsequent medical care and outcomes.

Methods and Results— Using a contemporary national clinical registry, we examined differences in medical care and in-hospital mortality among AMI patients admitted during regular hours (weekdays 7 AM to 7 PM) versus off-hours (weekends, holidays, and 7 PM to 7 AM weeknights). The study cohort included 62 814 AMI patients from the Get With the Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease database admitted to 379 hospitals throughout the United States from July 2000 through September 2005. Overall, 33 982 (54.1%) patients arrived during off-hours. Compared with those arriving during regular hours, eligible off-hour patients were slightly less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 0.98), had longer door-to-balloon times (median, 110 versus 85 minutes; P<0.0001), and were less likely to achieve door-to-balloon ≤90 minutes (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.39). Arrival during off-hours was associated with slightly lower overall revascularization rates (adjusted OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.97). No measurable differences, however, were found in in-hospital mortality between regular hours and off-hours in the overall AMI, ST-elevated MI, and non–ST-elevated MI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.06; adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.18; and adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.04, respectively). Similar observations were made across most age and sex subgroups and with an alternative definition for arrival time (weekends/holidays versus weekdays).

Conclusions— Despite slightly fewer primary percutaneous coronary interventions and overall revascularizations and significantly longer door-to-balloon times, patients presenting with AMI during off-hours had in-hospital mortality similar to those presenting during regular hours.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Find additional patient-related information at:

Read a summary of this article at americanheart.org

Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 2425-2427. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. A. Hlatky and P. Heidenreich
The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 15, 2009; 54(25): 2343 - 2351.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Fazel, H. M. Krumholz, E. R. Bates, W. J. French, P. D. Frederick, B. K. Nallamothu, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
Choice of Reperfusion Strategy at Hospitals With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Analysis
Circulation, December 15, 2009; 120(24): 2455 - 2461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
A. W. Hutchison, Y. Malaiapan, I. Jarvie, B. Barger, E. Watkins, G. Braitberg, T. Kambourakis, J. D. Cameron, and I. T. Meredith
Prehospital 12-Lead ECG to Triage ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Emergency Department Activation of the Infarct Team Significantly Improves Door-to-Balloon Times: Ambulance Victoria and MonashHEART Acute Myocardial Infarction (MonAMI) 12-Lead ECG Project
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, December 1, 2009; 2(6): 528 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
N. Danchin
Systems of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Impact of Different Models on Clinical Outcomes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
S. Pedersen, S. Galatius, R. Mogelvang, U. Davidsen, A. Galloe, S. Z. Abildstrom, U. Abildgaard, P. R. Hansen, J. Bech, A. Iversen, et al.
Long-Term Prognosis in an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Population Treated With Routine Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Clinical Trial to Real-Life Experience
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 392 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. G. Webb, R. Williams, and M. S. Marber
Lizard spit and reperfusion injury.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 10, 2009; 53(6): 511 - 513.
[Full Text] [PDF]