| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;117:2502-2509.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Health Services and Outcomes Research |
From the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (H.J., I.F.P., T.K., G.V.M., A.O.M.); UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (G.C.F.); TIMI Group and BWH, Boston, Mass (C.P.C.); Masspro, Inc, Waltham, Mass (K.A.L.); Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (L.L., L.K.N., E.P.); Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (G.F.); and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (L.W.).
Correspondence to Hani Jneid, MD, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRB 800 Boston, MA 02114. E-mail jneid.hani{at}mgh.harvard.edu
Received November 13, 2007; accepted March 13, 2008.
Background— Prior studies have demonstrated an inconsistent association between patients arrival time for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and their subsequent medical care and outcomes.
Methods and Results— Using a contemporary national clinical registry, we examined differences in medical care and in-hospital mortality among AMI patients admitted during regular hours (weekdays 7 AM to 7 PM) versus off-hours (weekends, holidays, and 7 PM to 7 AM weeknights). The study cohort included 62 814 AMI patients from the Get With the Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease database admitted to 379 hospitals throughout the United States from July 2000 through September 2005. Overall, 33 982 (54.1%) patients arrived during off-hours. Compared with those arriving during regular hours, eligible off-hour patients were slightly less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 0.98), had longer door-to-balloon times (median, 110 versus 85 minutes; P<0.0001), and were less likely to achieve door-to-balloon
90 minutes (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.39). Arrival during off-hours was associated with slightly lower overall revascularization rates (adjusted OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.97). No measurable differences, however, were found in in-hospital mortality between regular hours and off-hours in the overall AMI, ST-elevated MI, and non–ST-elevated MI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.06; adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.18; and adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.04, respectively). Similar observations were made across most age and sex subgroups and with an alternative definition for arrival time (weekends/holidays versus weekdays).
Conclusions— Despite slightly fewer primary percutaneous coronary interventions and overall revascularizations and significantly longer door-to-balloon times, patients presenting with AMI during off-hours had in-hospital mortality similar to those presenting during regular hours.
Find additional patient-related information at:
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Hlatky and P. Heidenreich The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 15, 2009; 54(25): 2343 - 2351. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fazel, H. M. Krumholz, E. R. Bates, W. J. French, P. D. Frederick, B. K. Nallamothu, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Choice of Reperfusion Strategy at Hospitals With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Analysis Circulation, December 15, 2009; 120(24): 2455 - 2461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Hutchison, Y. Malaiapan, I. Jarvie, B. Barger, E. Watkins, G. Braitberg, T. Kambourakis, J. D. Cameron, and I. T. Meredith Prehospital 12-Lead ECG to Triage ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Emergency Department Activation of the Infarct Team Significantly Improves Door-to-Balloon Times: Ambulance Victoria and MonashHEART Acute Myocardial Infarction (MonAMI) 12-Lead ECG Project Circ Cardiovasc Interv, December 1, 2009; 2(6): 528 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Danchin Systems of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Impact of Different Models on Clinical Outcomes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 901 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pedersen, S. Galatius, R. Mogelvang, U. Davidsen, A. Galloe, S. Z. Abildstrom, U. Abildgaard, P. R. Hansen, J. Bech, A. Iversen, et al. Long-Term Prognosis in an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Population Treated With Routine Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Clinical Trial to Real-Life Experience Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 392 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. G. Webb, R. Williams, and M. S. Marber Lizard spit and reperfusion injury. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 10, 2009; 53(6): 511 - 513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |