| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;117:1153-1160.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Imaging |
From the Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.N., J.C., J.F., R.W.); Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown (M.N., D.S., J.C., P.P., J.F., E.A., F.K.S., R.W.); Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center on Atherosclerosis (M.N., E.A., P.L., R.W.) and Department of Systems Biology (R.W.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (D.S.); and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.L.).
Correspondence to Matthias Nahrendorf, MD, MGH-CSB, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail MNahrendorf{at}mgh.harvard.edu
Received October 10, 2007; accepted December 20, 2007.
Background— Ischemic injury of the myocardium causes timed recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, which produce substantial amounts of local myeloperoxidase (MPO). MPO forms reactive chlorinating species capable of inflicting oxidative stress and altering protein function by covalent modification. We have used a small-molecule, gadolinium-based activatable sensor for magnetic resonance imaging of MPO activity (MPO-Gd). MPO-Gd is first radicalized by MPO and then either spontaneously oligomerizes or binds to matrix proteins, all leading to enhanced spin-lattice relaxivity and delayed washout kinetics. We hypothesized that MPO imaging could be used to measure inflammatory responses after myocardial ischemia locally and noninvasively in a murine model.
Methods and Results— We injected 0.3 mmol/kg MPO-Gd (or Gd-DTPA as control) and performed magnetic resonance imaging up to 120 minutes later in mice 2 days after myocardial infarction. The contrast-to-noise ratio (infarct versus septum) after Gd-DTPA injection peaked at 10 minutes and returned to preinjection values at 60 minutes. After injection of MPO-Gd, the contrast-to-noise ratio peaked later and was higher than Gd-DTPA (40.8±10.4 versus 10.5±0.2; P<0.05). MPO imaging was validated by magnetic resonance imaging of MPO–/– mice and correlated well with immunoreactive staining (r2=0.92, P<0.05), tissue activity by guaiacol assay (r2=0.65, P<0.001), and immunoblotting. In time course imaging, activity peaked 2 days after coronary ligation. Flow cytometry of digested infarcts detected MPO in neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages. Furthermore, serial MPO imaging accurately tracked the antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin therapy after ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Conclusions— MPO-Gd enables in vivo assessment of MPO activity in injured myocardium. This approach allows noninvasive evaluation of the inflammatory response to ischemia and has the potential to guide the development of novel cardioprotective therapies.
Related Article:
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |