Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:2798-2807
Published online before print May 18, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.829366
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/21/2798    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.829366v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chirinos, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by St John Sutton, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chirinos, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by St John Sutton, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Quantitative modeling
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:2798-2807.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension

Time-Varying Myocardial Stress and Systolic Pressure-Stress Relationship

Role in Myocardial-Arterial Coupling in Hypertension

Julio A. Chirinos, MD; Patrick Segers, PhD; Amit Kumar Gupta, MD; Abigail Swillens, MScEng; Ernst R. Rietzschel, MD; Marc L. De Buyzere, MSc; James N. Kirkpatrick, MD; Thierry C. Gillebert, MD, PhD; Yan Wang, MD; Martin G. Keane, MD; Raymond Townsend, MD; Victor A. Ferrari, MD; Susan E. Wiegers, MD; Martin St John Sutton, MD

From the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.A.C., A.K.G., J.N.K., Y.W., M.G.K., R.T., V.A.F., S.E.W., M.S.J.S.); Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (J.A.C.); Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics Research Unit, IBiTech, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (P.S., A.S.); and Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (E.R.R., M.L.D.B., T.C.G.).

Correspondence to Julio A. Chirinos, MD, Division of Cardiology, Room 8B111, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail julio.chirinos{at}uphs.upenn.edu

Received October 23, 2008; accepted April 6, 2009.

Background— Myocardial afterload depends on left ventricular (LV) cavity size, pressure, and wall thickness, all of which change markedly throughout ejection. We assessed the relationship between instantaneous ejection-phase pressure and myocardial stress and the effect of arterial wave reflections on myocardial stress in hypertensive and normotensive adults.

Methods and Results— We studied 42 untreated hypertensive, 42 treated hypertensive, and 42 normotensive adults with normal LV ejection fraction. Time-resolved central pressure, flow, and LV geometry were measured with carotid tonometry, Doppler, and speckle-tracking echocardiography for computation of arterial load and time-varying circumferential and longitudinal myocardial stress. In all 3 groups, peak myocardial stress typically occurred in early systole (within the first 100 milliseconds of ejection), followed by a marked midsystolic shift in the pressure-stress relationship, which favored lower late systolic stress values (P<0.001) relative to pressure. The mean magnitude of this midsystolic shift was quantitatively important in all 3 groups (circumferential stress, 144 to 148 kdynes/cm2) and was independently predicted by a higher LV ejection fraction and ratio of LV end-diastolic cavity to wall volume. Time of peak myocardial stress independently correlated with time of the first systolic but not with time of the second systolic central pressure peak.

Conclusions— Peak myocardial stress occurs in early systole, before important contributions of reflected waves to central pressure. In the presence of normal LV ejection fraction, a midsystolic shift in the pressure-stress relationship protects cardiomyocytes against excessive late systolic stress (despite pressure augmentation associated with wave reflections), a coupling mechanism that may be altered in various disease states.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Circulation: Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 2749-2751. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Tschope and W. J. Paulus
Doppler Echocardiography Yields Dubious Estimates of Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressures
Circulation, September 1, 2009; 120(9): 810 - 820.
[Full Text] [PDF]