Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;120:1203-1212
Published online before print September 14, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Circulation: September 29, 2009, Volume 120, Number 13
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
120/13/1203    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rapezzi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perlini, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rapezzi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perlini, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Amyloidosis
*Cardiomyopathy
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;120:1203-1212.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Heart Failure

Systemic Cardiac Amyloidoses

Disease Profiles and Clinical Courses of the 3 Main Types

Claudio Rapezzi, MD; Giampaolo Merlini, MD; Candida C. Quarta, MD; Letizia Riva, MD; Simone Longhi, MD; Ornella Leone, MD; Fabrizio Salvi, MD; Paolo Ciliberti, MD; Francesca Pastorelli, MD; Elena Biagini, MD; Fabio Coccolo, MD; Robin M.T. Cooke, MA; Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani, MSc, MStat; Diego Sangiorgi, MStat; Alessandra Ferlini, MD; Michele Cavo, MD; Elena Zamagni, MD; Maria Luisa Fonte, MD; Giovanni Palladini, MD; Francesco Salinaro, MD; Francesco Musca, MD; Laura Obici, MD; Angelo Branzi, MD; Stefano Perlini, MD

From the Institute of Cardiology (C.R., C.C.Q., L.R., S.L., P.C., E.B., F.C., R.M.T.C., L.B.-R., D.S., A.B.), Department of Pathology (O.L.), and Institute of Hematology (M.C., E.Z.), University of Bologna, and S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna; Center for Amyloidosis, Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia (G.M., M.L.F., G.P., F. Salinaro, F.M., L.O., S.P.); Department of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna (F. Salvi, F.P.); and Department of Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Genetics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara (A.F.), Italy.

Correspondence to Professor Claudio Rapezzi, Istituto di Cardiologia, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti n 9, 40125 Bologna, Italy. E-mail claudio.rapezzi{at}unibo.it

Received December 23, 2008; accepted July 17, 2009.

Background— Most studies of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy consider as a single entity the 3 main systemic cardiac amyloidoses: acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain (AL); hereditary, mutated transthyretin-related (ATTRm); and wild-type transthyretin-related (ATTRwt). In this study, we compared the diagnostic/clinical profiles of these 3 types of systemic cardiac amyloidosis.

Methods and Results— We conducted a longitudinal study of 233 patients with clear-cut diagnosis by type of cardiac amyloidosis (AL, n=157; ATTRm, n=61; ATTRwt, n=15) at 2 large Italian centers providing coordinated amyloidosis diagnosis/management facilities since 1990. Average age at diagnosis was higher in AL than in ATTRm patients; all ATTRwt patients except 1 were elderly men. At diagnosis, mean left ventricular wall thickness was higher in ATTRwt than in ATTRm and AL. Left ventricular ejection fraction was moderately depressed in ATTRwt but not in AL or ATTRm. ATTRm patients less often displayed low QRS voltage (25% versus 60% in AL; P<0.0001) or low voltage-to-mass ratio (1.1±0.5 versus 0.9±0.5; P<0.0001). AL patients appeared to have greater hemodynamic impairment. On multivariate analysis, ATTRm was a strongly favorable predictor of survival, and ATTRwt predicted freedom from major cardiac events.

Conclusions— AL, ATTRm, and ATTRwt should be considered 3 different cardiac diseases, probably characterized by different pathophysiological substrates and courses. Awareness of the diversity underlying the cardiac amyloidosis label is important on several levels, ranging from disease classification to diagnosis and clinical management.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 120: 1165-1167. [Extract] [Full Text]