Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;120:1561-1568
Published online before print October 5, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.834739
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
120/16/1561    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.834739v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Escaned, J.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Escaned, J.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Transplantation
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrowRelated Articles

(Circulation. 2009;120:1561-1568.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Coronary Heart Disease

Assessment of Microcirculatory Remodeling With Intracoronary Flow Velocity and Pressure Measurements

Validation With Endomyocardial Sampling in Cardiac Allografts

Javier Escaned, MD, PhD; Alex Flores, MD, PhD; Pablo García-Pavía, MD; Javier Segovia, MD, PhD; Jesús Jimenez, MD, PhD; Paloma Aragoncillo, MD, PhD; Clara Salas, MD; Fernando Alfonso, MD, PhD; Rosana Hernández, MD, PhD; Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, MD, PhD; Camino Bañuelos, MD; Luis Alonso-Pulpón, MD, PhD; Carlos Macaya, MD, PhD

From the Cardiovascular Institute (J.E., A.F., F.A., R.H., D.J.A., F.J.-Q., C.B., C.M.) and Department of Pathology (P.A.), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, and Departments of Cardiology (P.G.-P., J.S., J.J., L.A.-P.) and Pathology (C.S.), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.

Correspondence to Dr Javier Escaned, Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain. E-mail escaned{at}secardiologia.es

Received November 9, 2008; accepted July 31, 2009.

Background— Intracoronary physiology techniques have been validated extensively for the assessment of epicardial stenoses but not for the lone study of coronary microcirculation. We performed a comparison between 4 intracoronary physiological indices with the actual structural microcirculatory changes documented in transplanted hearts.

Methods and Results— In 17 cardiac allograft patients without coronary stenoses, ECG, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity, and aortic pressure were digitally recorded before and during maximal hyperemia with a dedicated system. Postprocessing of data yielded 4 indices of microcirculatory status: coronary flow velocity reserve (2.13±0.59), instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity pressure slope (2.33±1.25 cm · s · –1mm Hg–1), coronary resistance index (1.65±0.88 mm Hg · cm–1 · s–1), and coronary resistance reserve (2.36±0.65). Quantitative morphometry was performed in endomyocardial biopsies during the same hospital intake; arteriolar obliteration (76.57±6.95%) and density (2.00±1.22 arterioles per 1 mm2) and capillary density (645±179 capillaries per 1 mm2) were measured. Univariate regression analysis between intracoronary measurements and histological findings revealed that instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope correlated with arteriolar obliteration (r=0.58, P=0.014) and capillary density (r=0.60, P=0.012). Statistical adjustment revealed an independent contribution of arteriolar obliteration (β=0.61, P=0.0009) and capillary density (β=–0.60, P=0.0008) to instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope values, resulting in an excellent predictive model (r=0.84, P=0.0002). Coronary resistance index correlated only with capillary density (r=0.70, P=0.019). Relative indices (coronary flow velocity reserve and coronary resistance reserve) did not correlate significantly with arteriolar obliteration, capillary density, or arteriolar density.

Conclusions— Intracoronary indices derived from pressure and flow, particularly instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope, appear to be superior to coronary flow velocity reserve in detecting structural microcirculatory changes. Both arteriolar obliteration and capillary rarefaction seem to influence microcirculatory hemodynamics independently.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Articles:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 120: 1553-1554. [Extract] [Full Text]

Assessment of Structural Disease in the Coronary Microvasculature
Peter Ganz and Priscilla Y. Hsue
Circulation 2009 120: 1555-1557. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Ganz and P. Y. Hsue
Assessment of Structural Disease in the Coronary Microvasculature
Circulation, October 20, 2009; 120(16): 1555 - 1557.
[Full Text] [PDF]