Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1958;18:613-622

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOK, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by PRUITT, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COOK, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by PRUITT, R. D.

(Circulation. 1958;18:613.)
© 1958 American Heart Association, Inc.


Electrocardiographic Changes in Acute Subendocardial Infarction

II. Small Subendocardial Infarcts

RODERICK W. COOK M.D.1; JESSE E. EDWARDS M.D.1; RAYMOND D. PRUITT M.D.1

1 From the Mayo Clinic and the Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota. The Mayo Foundation is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.

Among 24 cases of small subendocardial infarctions included in this report are 10 cases of anteroseptal distribution in which the electrocardiogram was characterized by the presence of deeply inverted T waves in some or all of the precordial leads. Two other types of change encountered among the remaining 14 cases are described. Electrocardiographic changes in this group of 24 cases are compared with changes encountered in 5 cases of large and near circumferential acute subendocardial infarction described in part I of this study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. S. Ahmed and R. R. Brancato
Transmural Versus Nontransmural Myocardial Infarction: Influence of Location On Clinical Features and Mortality
Angiology, April 1, 1979; 30(4): 240 - 248.
[PDF]