Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1950;2:111-121

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CRONVICH, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by BURCH, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CRONVICH, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by BURCH, G. E.

(Circulation. 1950;2:111.)
© 1950 American Heart Association, Inc.


Standardizing Factors in Electrocardiography

JAMES A. CRONVICH M.S.1; JOHN P. CONWAY M.D.1; GEORGE E. BURCH M.D.1

1 From the School of Electrical Engineering and Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine and Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans.

Modifications in recorder standardization are required to correct inherent scalar differences among potential differences measured in a given electrocardiographic reference frame. In the frontal plane, agreement between the resultant vectors calculated from unipolar limb lead measurements and from standard lead measurements can be obtained by standardizing the galvanometer for recording the unipolar limb lead potentials at radic3 cm. per millivolt. A method for calculating this "standardizing factor" and similar factors for other reference frames is presented and applied to calculations for the equilateral tetrahedron, the isosceles tetrahedron, and the cube.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
VECTORCARDIOGRAPHY
Arch Intern Med, August 1, 1952; 90(2): 137 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]