Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1961;24:506-517

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, C. McC.
Right arrow Articles by HOFFMAN, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, C. McC.
Right arrow Articles by HOFFMAN, B. F.

(Circulation. 1961;24:506.)
© 1961 American Heart Association, Inc.


Physiology of Atrioventricular Transmission

Chandler McC. Brooks Ph.D. BRIAN F. HOFFMAN M.D.1

1 From the Department of Physiology, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn. New York.

This paper describes records of the transmembrane action potential of fibers from different parts of the specialized conducting system and electrograms recorded directly from these fibers in situ. On the basis of these records it is possible to describe certain physiologic mechanisms for conduction delay, block, and supernormal conduction. In general, impaired conduction is associated with a reduced level of membrane potential. This may be caused by incomplete repolarization or partial depolarization. In the normal conducting system, local differences in, action-potential duration and local pacemaker activity most frequently are the cause of a low membrane potential. In disease states, on the other hand, many other factors may be operative. At the atrial margin of the atrioventricular (A-V) node, local anatomic and electrophysiologic properties of the fibers normally cause a very low conduction velocity. The safety factors for conduction here appear to be quite low, and delayed transmission or block often does not result from refractoriness or partial depolarization of nodal fibers. Supernormal conduction, at least in Purkinje fibers, seems to result from the high level of membrane potential reached at the end of repolarization. Whether other factors are responsible for supernormality within the A-V node remains to be seen.