Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1962;25:484-492

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FITZPATRICK, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by RICHARDSON, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FITZPATRICK, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by RICHARDSON, D. W.

(Circulation. 1962;25:484.)
© 1962 American Heart Association, Inc.


Restoration of Normal Intracardiac Pressures after Extensive Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis

D. P. FITZPATRICK M.D.1; E. M. WYSO M.D.1; L. H. BOSHER M.D.1; D. W. RICHARDSON M.D.1

1 From the Medical and Surgical Services, McGuire V. A. Hospital and the Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.

In each of seven patients studied by cardiac catheterization more than 2 weeks after extensive pericardiectomy, performed because of constrictive pericarditis, normal right heart pressure-pulse contours were demonstrated.

The extensiveness of pericardial removal seems the most likely explanation for the normal catheterization findings, which contrast with demonstration by other workers of persistence for periods up to 2 years of the "W"-shaped atrial pressures and high end-diastolic ventricular pressures characteristic of pericardial constriction.

Clinical findings, abnormal right heart pressures, and surgical considerations are presented for a total of 11 patients with constrictive pericarditis who were subjected to pericardiectomy between 1955 and 1960.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. K. Chowdhury, G. K. Subramaniam, A. S. Kumar, B. Airan, R. Singh, S. Talwar, S. Seth, P. K. Mishra, K. K. Pradeep, S. Sathia, et al.
Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: A Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Two Surgical Techniques
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 522 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. J. Skubas, M. Beardslee, B. Barzilai, M. Pasque, M. Kattapuram, and D. G. Lappas
Constrictive Pericarditis: Intraoperative Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Evaluation of Cardiac Filling Dynamics
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1424 - 1426.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. H. Ling, J. K. Oh, H. V. Schaff, G. K. Danielson, D. W. Mahoney, J. B. Seward, and A. J. Tajik
Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era : Evolving Clinical Spectrum and Impact on Outcome After Pericardiectomy
Circulation, September 28, 1999; 100(13): 1380 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Senni, M. M. Redfield, L. H. Ling, G. K. Danielson, A. J. Tajik, and J. K. Oh
Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis: Doppler echocardiographic findings and correlation with clinical status
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1182 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]