Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1963;27:503-511

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOYNER, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by BOND, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by JOYNER, C. R., JR.
Right arrow Articles by BOND, J. P.

(Circulation. 1963;27:503.)
© 1963 American Heart Association, Inc.


Reflected Ultrasound in the Assessment of Mitral Valve Disease

CLAUDE R. JOYNER JR. M.D.1; JOHN M. REID B.E.E., M.S.1; JAMES P. BOND B.S.1

1 From the Edward B. Robinette Foundation, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and the Electromedical Division of the Moore School of Electrical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

An ultrasound beam directed into a medium of uniform acoustical impedance will travel in a straight line, but a portion of the waves will be reflected at the interface of a medium of different acoustical impedance. A time-distance curve of motion has been obtained from the heart by recording the echoes returned to a send-receive ultrasound transducer applied in the third, fourth, or fifth left interspace. A characteristic curve having two anterior peaks during each cardiac cycle was obtained in the 25 normal patients studied. One peak follows the P wave of the electrocardiogram and is not seen in atrial fibrillation. The other peak of motion toward the anterior chest is followed by rapid regression posteriorly during ventricular diastole. The velocity of the motion was 85 to 160 mm./sec. in normal subjects. In contrast, the records from 90 patients with mitral stenosis demonstrated a distinctive, abnormal pattern having a plateautype configuration with a velocity of posterior motion of only 2 to 35 mm./sec. The configuration of the curve changed toward normal after successful mitral valvulotomy but none of the 35 patients who were studied before and after surgery has developed a calculated postoperative velocity exceeding 70 mm./sec.

Twelve patients with "pure" mitral regurgitation have had records similar to the normal, with velocities in or above the normal range. None of the 135 other patients studied, representing a variety of conditions, demonstrated a curve of the type found in mitral stenosis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
H. Feigenbaum
The first long-lasting use of echocardiography: a result of a false advertisement.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 522 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
R. A. Meyer
History of Ultrasound in Cardiology
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 1 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Feigenbaum
Evolution of Echocardiography
Circulation, April 1, 1996; 93(7): 1321 - 1327.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. L. Fisher, A. F. Parisi, G. D. Plotnick, C. E. DeFelice, N. H. Carliner, and N. J. Fortuin
Assessment of Severity of Mitral Stenosis by Echocardiographic Leaflet Separation
Arch Intern Med, April 1, 1979; 139(4): 402 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. S. WANN, A. E. WEYMAN, H. FEIGENBAUM, J. C. DILLON, K. W. JOHNSTON, and R. C. EGGLETON
Determination of Mitral Valve Area by Cross-Sectional Echocardiography
Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1978; 88(3): 337 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. R. TICZON, A. N. DAMATO, A. R. CARACTA, S. H. LAU, and L. GROSS
Echocardiographic Manifestation of "False" Mitral Stenosis That Was
Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1975; 83(4): 503 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Gustafson, I. Edler, O. Dahlback, J. Kaude, and S. Persson
Left Atrial Myxoma Diagnosed By Ultrasound Cardiography
Angiology, September 1, 1973; 24(9): 554 - 562.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
W. Dock
Production Mode of Systolic Clicks Due to Mitral Cusp Prolapse
Arch Intern Med, July 1, 1973; 132(1): 118 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
W.S. Frankl, R. Mac Millan, and W.K. Smith
Differential Echocardiographic Patterns in Mitral Regurgitation
Angiology, November 1, 1972; 23(11): 642 - 650.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. B. Goldberg, B. J. Ostrum, and H. J. Isard
Ultrasonic Determination of Pericardial Effusion
JAMA, December 4, 1967; 202(10): 927 - 930.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. R. Joyner Jr., R. J. Herman, and J. M. Reid
Reflected Ultrasound in the Detection and Localization of Pleural Effusion
JAMA, May 1, 1967; 200(5): 399 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. Zaky, L. Grabhorn, and H. Feigenbaum
Movement of the Mitral Ring: A Study in Ultrasoundcardiography
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1967; 1(2): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H. FEIGENBAUM
Diagnostic Ultrasound
Ann Intern Med, July 1, 1966; 65(1): 185 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. L. Segal, W. Likoff, and B. Kingsley
Echocardiography: Clinical Application in Mitral Stenosis
JAMA, January 17, 1966; 195(3): 161 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. Feigenbaum, J. A. Waldhausen, and L. P. Hyde
Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pericardial Effusion
JAMA, March 1, 1965; 191(9): 711 - 714.
[Abstract] [PDF]