Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1964;29:523-532

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAGNUCCI, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by THORN, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VAGNUCCI, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by THORN, G. W.

(Circulation. 1964;29:523.)
© 1964 American Heart Association, Inc.


Acute Infusion of Synthetic Angiotensin II in Patients with Essential Hypertension

Its Effect on Renal Hemodynamics and on Electrolyte and Water Excretion

ANTONIO I. VAGNUCCI M.D.1; DAVID P. LAULER M.D.1; ROGER B. HICKLER M.D.1; GEORGE W. THORN M.D.1

1 From the Hypertension Unit, Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Angiotensin II (1-l-asparaginyl-5-l-valyl angiotensin octapeptide) infused intravenously in subjects with idiopathic hypertension caused depression of the renal hemodynamics in all of them. In agreement with the findings of other investigators, more than one third of the patients showed a decrease in the rate of the sodium excretion; in the remaining subjects, the pressor infusion increased the excretion of sodium.

In all the hypertensive patients, angiotensin II favored renal reabsorption of water.

From the available evidence, it appears that angiotensin II acts upon the renal tubules. The reason for the opposite effect on sodium excretion in hypertensive patients remains unexplained.