Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1965;31:651-660

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LINENTHAL, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by ZOLL, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LINENTHAL, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by ZOLL, P. M.

(Circulation. 1965;31:651.)
© 1965 American Heart Association, Inc.


Ventricular Fusion Beats during Electric Stimulation in Man

Application to Conduction Velocity and Anomalous AV Excitation

ARTHUR J. LINENTHAL M.D.1 PAUL M. ZOLL M.D.1

1 From the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Quantitative studies of ventricular fusion beats were made in 40 patients with Stokes- Adams disease after implantation of electric pacemakers in the left ventricle. The two fusing complexes came from an electric pacemaker and either a second electric pacemaker or a conducted sinoatrial beat. The limit of fusion, that is the maximal time between two fusing complexes, gives a measure of the conduction time and velocity between the two points of initial ventricular depolarization.

Conduction between two electric pacemakers and in retrograde direction from an electric pacemaker to the point of entry of a conducted beat was by way of ordinary myocardium; its velocity was about 1 meter per second. Conduction in antegrade direction, on the other hand, was by way of specialized Purkinje tissue; and its velocity was 4.5 to 9 times faster.

Variations in conduction times with bundle-branch block support this interpretation: retrograde conduction time did not change; antegrade conduction time was prolonged in left but was usually unchanged in right bundle-branch block.

The morphologic similarities of fusion beats in our patients to the features of anomalous AV excitation add strong evidence in man to the previous analogous experimental observations that the WPW complex is a fusion beat. Furthermore, quantitative comparison of WPW and our fusion beats supports the theory that the anomalous excitation in the WPW phenomenon, like the peripherally located artificial stimulus, enters the ventricle peripherally, by way of an accessory AV pathway.