This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by EDMANDS, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by EDMANDS, R. E.

(Circulation. 1966;34:1081.)
© 1966 American Heart Association, Inc.

---

An Epidemiological Assessment of Bundle-Branch Block

ROBERT E. EDMANDS M.D.¹

¹ From the Seal Beach Substation of the Heart Disease Control Program Field and Training Station, U. S. Public Health Service, San Francisco, California.

Complete bundle-branch block was found in 57 of 1,560 (3.7%) electrocardiograms routinely recorded on members of a retirement community. Of this number, 19 were identified as left bundle-branch block (LBBB), while 38 fulfilled the criteria for right bundlebranch block (RBBB).

Individuals with LBBB were found to have cardiomegaly more frequently than did individuals with normal electrocardiograms. Individuals with RBBB, regarded as a homogeneous group, also demonstrated a greater prevalence of cardiomegaly than did the control group, but the difference from normals was less striking than in the case of LBBB. Neither LBBB nor RBBB was significantly associated with hypertension, as defined in the text.

When the common, uncomplicated RBBB was regarded as a separate entity, the prevalences of hypertension and cardiomegaly were indistinguishable from those of a control group with normal electrocardiograms. The RBBB variant, regarded as a possible manifestation of left ventricular disease secondary to hypertrophy or myocardial infarction, was found to be frequently associated with hypertension, cardiomegaly, and the need for digitalis therapy. RBBB with left axis deviation, regarded as a complication of the common RBBB due to left ventricular hypertrophy or myocardial infarction, was similarly associated with a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease. None of the 38 cases of RBBB fulfilled the criteria for classic RBBB.

It is suggested, therefore, that the chronic uncomplicated RBBB in the adult may indeed bear a less ominous portent than has previously been ascribed to it. This is suggested only in relation to the parameters evaluated, however; prospective evaluation is clearly necessary to assess the validity of such an inference.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Eriksson, L. Wilhelmsen, and A. Rosengren Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years: The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2005; 26(21): 2300 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Crow, P. J. Hannan, and A. R. Folsom Prognostic Significance of Corrected QT and Corrected JT Interval for Incident Coronary Heart Disease in a General Population Sample Stratified by Presence or Absence of Wide QRS Complex: The ARIC Study With 13 Years of Follow-Up Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1985 - 1989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Dorman, M. J. Breslow, P. J. Pronovost, P. Rock, and B. A. Rosenfeld Bundle-Branch Block as a Risk Factor in Noncardiac Surgery Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2000; 160(8): 1149 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Eriksson, P.-O. Hansson, H. Eriksson, and M. Dellborg Bundle-Branch Block in a General Male Population : The Study of Men Born 1913 Circulation, December 1, 1998; 98(22): 2494 - 2500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]