Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1967;35:70-78

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAHIMTOOLA, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by SWAN, H. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RAHIMTOOLA, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by SWAN, H. J. C.

(Circulation. 1967;35:70.)
© 1967 American Heart Association, Inc.


Ventricular Performance after Angiocardiography

SHAHBUDIN H. RAHIMTOOLA M.B.1; JOHN P. DUFFY M.D.1; H. J. C. SWAN M.B.1

1 From the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

Ventricular performance was assessed before and after angiocardiography in 22 patients with normal left ventricle, mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, and myocardial disease. The increased circulating blood volume known to occur after angiocardiography is a determinant of the increased ventricular pre-load. The after-load is unchanged. Patients with normal left ventricle and some patients with valve stenosis responded by an increase in the work performed and some had only a minimal or no increase. A group of patients with serious heart disease performed less work. If the ventricular response can be considered on the basis of the Frank-Starling principle, then the abnormal response of such patients is due to an altered length-tension relationship.


Key Words: Mitral stenosis • Myocardial disease • Normal ventricle • Congenital aortic valve stenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. H. Eckman, H. J. Levine, and S. G. Pauker
Effect of Laboratory Variation in the Prothrombin-Time Ratio on the Results of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 2, 1993; 329(10): 696 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. H. Eckman, J. R. Beshansky, I. Durand-Zaleski, H. J. Levine, and S. G. Pauker
Anticoagulation for Noncardiac Procedures in Patients With Prosthetic Heart Valves: Does Low Risk Mean High Cost?
JAMA, March 16, 1990; 263(11): 1513 - 1521.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
E. A. Rittenhouse, H. Mohri, D. D. Reichenbach, and K. A. Merendino
Heparin-Bound Aminoethylcellulose as an Antithrombogenic Surface
Arch Surg, November 1, 1972; 105(5): 752 - 755.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
K. Kubo, E. Mazzei, and D. G. Mulder
Valve Replacement Using Heterografts: Clinical Experience
Arch Surg, June 1, 1971; 102(6): 562 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. R. Wychulis, D. C. Connolly, and F. H. Ellis Jr.
Open Mitral Valve Reconstruction: Review of 232 Operations
Arch Surg, August 1, 1970; 101(2): 332 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. C. HYLEN, F. E. KLOSTER, A. STARR, and H. E. GRISWOLD
Aortic Ball Variance: Diagnosis and Treatment
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 1970; 72(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. E. Duvoisin and D. C. McGoon
Aortic Valve Replacement With a Ball-Valve Prosthesis: Detailed Analysis of Early and Late Results
Arch Surg, December 1, 1969; 99(6): 684 - 689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. L. London
Myocardial Infarction, Presumably Embolic: Late Complication of Prosthetic-Valve Surgery
JAMA, September 18, 1967; 201(12): 970 - 972.
[Abstract] [PDF]