Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1967;35:I-15-I-23

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MASON, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by MORROW, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MASON, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by MORROW, A. G.

(Circulation. 1967;35:I-15.)
© 1967 American Heart Association, Inc.


Combined Prosthetic Replacement of the Mitral and Aortic Valves

Preoperative and Postoperative Hemodynamic Studies at Rest and the Left Ventricular Response to Muscular Exercise

DEAN T. MASON M.D.1; JOHN ROSS JR. M.D.1; JAMES H. GAULT M.D.1; EUGENE BRAUNWALD M.D.1; ANDREW G. MORROW M.D.1

1 From the Cardiology Branch and the Clinic of Surgery, National Heart Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Detailed preoperative and postoperative hemodynamic studies were carried out in 12 patients with severe aortic and mitral valve disease in whom replacement of both valves with ball-valve prostheses was carried out. Replacement of both valves resulted in restoration to normal, or nearly normal, the resting values of cardiac output, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance. However, studies of left ventricular function during muscular exercise revealed abnormalities in the relationships between cardiac output and oxygen consumption in six of seven patients, and in no patient was the left ventricular response to exercise normal when assessed by the relation between LVEDP and stroke volume. It appears likely, therefore, that underlying myocardial disease or coronary arterial disease contributed to the preoperative disability in these patients, and may limit complete symptomatic recovery following operation. The residual impairment of myocardial performance observed in these patients appears to be more pronounced than that previously demonstrated in patients in whom isolated replacement of either the mitral or aortic valve had been performed.