Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1967;35:1084-1091

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by MCGREGOR, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by MCGREGOR, M.

(Circulation. 1967;35:1084.)
© 1967 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hemodynamic Studies in Cardiogenic Shock

Treatment with Isoproterenol and Metaraminol

H. J. SMITH M.D., F.R.C.P. (C.)1; A. ORIOL M.D.1; J. MORCH M.D., F.R.C.P., (C.)1; M. MCGREGOR M.D., M.R.C.P., F.R.C.P. (C.)1

1 From the Joint Cardio-Respiratory Service of the Royal Victoria Hospital and Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

In 14 subjects with severe cardiogenic shock the characteristic findings before treatment were hypotension, low cardiac output, and increased central venous pressure, with normal values for total peripheral resistance. Oliguria, lactic acidosis, hypocapnia, and hypoxemia also were present. These changes were interpreted as reflecting acute heart failure in association with a peripheral vascular response which was inadequate to maintain normal blood pressure. Isoproterenol caused a decrease in venous pressure and an increase in cardiac output. In most cases this was sufficient to increase blood pressure, despite slight reductions in peripheral vascular resistance. In a few cases, however, the inotropic effect of the drug was so small that the reduction in vascular resistance caused a further fall in arterial pressure. Metaraminol caused elevation of venous pressure, peripheral resistance, and blood pressure at the expense of some reduction of cardiac output. An approach to therapy is discussed in the light of these findings.


Key Words: Myocardial infarction • Cardiac output • Bacteremic shock • Vasoconstrictor drugs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. Kohsaka, V. Menon, A. M. Lowe, M. Lange, V. Dzavik, L. A. Sleeper, J. S. Hochman, and for the SHOCK Investigators
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Arch Intern Med, July 25, 2005; 165(14): 1643 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. W. Landry and J. A. Oliver
The Pathogenesis of Vasodilatory Shock
N. Engl. J. Med., August 23, 2001; 345(8): 588 - 595.
[Full Text] [PDF]