Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1967;36:238-244

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BELLET, S.
Right arrow Articles by ROMAN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BELLET, S.
Right arrow Articles by ROMAN, L.

(Circulation. 1967;36:238.)
© 1967 American Heart Association, Inc.


Comparison of the Double Two-Step Test and the Maximal Exercise Treadmill Test

Studies in Coronary-Prone Subjects

SAMUEL BELLET M.D.1 LAURIAN ROMAN M.D.1

1 From the Division of Cardiology, Philadelphia General Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

A comparison of the double two-step test and a more strenuous type of exercise test was made to assess the value of the latter procedure in increasing the sensitivity of the electrocardiographic exercise test.

In young, normal women, 17 to 20 years of age, who represent a group with minimal chances for significant silent coronary heart disease, both the double two-step test and graded maximal exercise tests were always normal. This is consistent with the view that ischemic electrocardiographic changes are not usually elicited in subjects with normal coronary circulation, even after strenuous exercise.

In middle-aged men and women, 40 to 65 years of age, in whom the possible existence of clinically silent coronary heart disease was suggested by age and other parameters (atypical chest pain, hypertension, or diabetes, or all three), the maximal exercise test on the treadmill, as compared to the double two-step test, increased the yield of positive electrocardiographic results by 12%. These findings suggest that, in selected "coronary-prone" subjects on whom the double two-step test is negative, increasing the amount of exercise might be of value in the evaluation of the exercise test.


Key Words: ECG exercise test • Radioelectrocardiography • Myocardial ischemia • Coronary atherosclerosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. Ikram, W.C. Chan, P.J. Bones, and E. Sherry
Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Sensitivity of the Exercise Test in Coronary Artery Disease
Angiology, April 1, 1980; 31(4): 246 - 253.
[PDF]