Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1969;39:361-378

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TALLEY, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by MCNAY, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TALLEY, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by MCNAY, J. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DOPAMINE

(Circulation. 1969;39:361.)
© 1969 American Heart Association, Inc.


A Hemodynamic Comparison of Dopamine and Isoproterenol in Patients in Shock

ROBERT C. TALLEY M.D.1; LEON I. GOLDBERG PH.D., M.D.1; CHARLES E. JOHNSON M.D.1; JOHN L. MCNAY M.D.1

1 From the Department of Medicine (Division of Clinical Pharmacology) and the Medical Services of Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

The hemodynamic responses to isoproterenol and dopamine were investigated in 22 patients with the shock syndrome from various etiologies. Dopamine was superior to isoproterenol in seven patients with normal or low peripheral resistance. In this group of patients administration of isoproterenol was associated with unacceptably low blood pressure. Isoproterenol was superior in three patients in whom dopamine did not increase cardiac output. Both amines produced adequate clinical response in four patients, and a combination of isoproterenol and dopamine was necessary for adequate therapy in two patients. Six patients did not respond hemodynamically or clinically to either dopamine or isoproterenol. This investigation has demonstrated that optimal sympathomimetic amine therapy of shock is facilitated by an analysis of hemodynamic status and responses to drug administration.


Key Words: Hemodynamics of shock • Cardiac output • Peripheral resistance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
G. S. Francis and S. L. Archer
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Congestive Heart Failure in the Intensive Care Unit
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 1989; 4(2): 84 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. D. Guazzi, P. G. Agostoni, E. Doria, A. Loaldi, M. Pepi, and A. Polese
Hemodynamic Response to Oral Prenalterol in Dilated Decompensated Cardiomyopathy as a Result of Cardiac and Vascular Effects
Angiology, December 1, 1985; 36(12): 857 - 866.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. Shahar, D. Lotan, and Z. Barzilay
Dopamine-induced Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia in an Infant
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 1981; 20(8): 541 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]