Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1969;39:623-632

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WIENER, L.
Right arrow Articles by COX, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WIENER, L.
Right arrow Articles by COX, J. W.

(Circulation. 1969;39:623.)
© 1969 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hemodynamic Effects of Nitroglycerin, Propranolol, and Their Combination in Coronary Heart Disease

LESLIE WIENER M.D.1; EDWARD M. DWYER JR. M.D.1; J. WILLIAM COX M.D., PH.D.1

1 From the Cardiac Physiology Research Laboratory and Cardiac Care Unit, Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York, and U. S. Naval Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The hemodynamic effects of 10 mg of propranolol given intravenously (iv) were studied in 10 patients (group I) with coronary heart disease (CHD). These results were compared with the hemodynamic effects in a similar group of the nine (CHD) patients (group II) who were studied after administration of 0.6 mg of nitroglycerin and then after receiving 10 mg of propranolol iv with a second 0.6-mg dose of nitroglycerin. Measurements were obtained at rest and during exercise: before treatment, after nitroglycerin alone, after propranolol alone, and after nitroglycerin-propranolol in combination. Pretreatment exercise showed a 125% increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) to 43 mm Hg and a 163% increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) to 29 mm Hg. Nitroglycerin decreased PAP (–45%) and LVEDP (–66%); as did nitroglycerin-propranolol: PAP (–33%) and LVEDP (–38%). Nitroglycerin reduced tension-time index (TTI) –21%, and increased cardiac index (CI) +17%, heart rate (HR) +10%, left ventricular work index (LVWI) +11%, and left ventricular dp/dt (LV dp/dt) +22%. By contrast, nitroglycerin-propranolol reduced LVWI –14%, LV dp/dt –30%, TTI – 15%, and HR – 13% but did not significantly alter CI from pretreatment.

Propranolol increased PAP to 40 mm Hg, did not change LVEDP at 29 mm Hg and decreased stroke index (SI) 16%. Nitroglycerin-propranolol diminished PA and LVED pressure and increased SI 14%. Effects of propranolol alone and of nitroglycerin-propranolol on HR, TTI, and LV dp/dt were not significantly different.

Nitroglycerin-propranolol appears to have important advantages over nitroglycerin or propranolol alone. A reduction in HR, TTI, and LV dp/dt, determinants of myocardial oxygen consumption, concurrent with improved left ventricular function, demonstrates a beneficial synergistic hemodynamic action for nitroglycerin combined with propranolol.


Key Words: Left ventricular hemodynamics • Exercise hemodynamics