Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1969;40:289-296

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHEUER, J.
Right arrow Articles by BAHNSON, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SCHEUER, J.
Right arrow Articles by BAHNSON, H. T.

(Circulation. 1969;40:289.)
© 1969 American Heart Association, Inc.


Electrocardiographic Findings in Cardiac Transplantation

JAMES SCHEUER M.D.1; JAMES A. SHAVER M.D.1; BARRY C. HARRIS M.D.1; JAMES J. LEONARD M.D.1; HENRY T. BAHNSON M.D.1

1 From the Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

This paper outlines the electrocardiographic course of a 46-year-old recipient of a cardiac transplant in whom direct myocardial leads were implanted. There was one episode of decreased QRS voltage with an intraventricular conduction delay, suggestive of an acute immunologic rejection. On one occasion bradycardia occurred, and this was treated by ventricular pacing. There was also an episode of supraventricular tachycardia. Vagotonic maneuvers or agents would not have been appropriate treatment for this arrhythmia. In the presence of both donor and recipient P waves, the interpretation of some of the arrhythmias was difficult.

Since the QRS voltage is important in diagnosing early rejection, great care was taken in accurately standardizing the electrocardiogram and in reproducibly placing electrocardiographic leads. The myocardial leads were found to reflect voltage changes more clearly than surface leads. The presence of myocardial wires also proved convenient for pacing. The use of a right atrial recording electrode is recommended for the diagnosis of complex arrhythmias. This will permit more accurate identification of donor and recipient P waves.


Key Words: Arrhythmias • Parasystole • Graft rejection