Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1969;40:545-554

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEIDENREICH, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by LEONARD, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HEIDENREICH, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by LEONARD, J. J.

(Circulation. 1969;40:545.)
© 1969 American Heart Association, Inc.


Left Atrial Transport in Mitral Stenosis

FRED P. HEIDENREICH M.D.1; MARK E. THOMPSON M.D.1; JAMES A. SHAVER M.D.1; JAMES J. LEONARD M.D.1

1 From the Cardiac Diagnostic Laboratories, Presbyterian-University Hospital, and the Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Active left atrial transport was examined acutely in five patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm. To observe the effect of active left atrial contraction on subsequent left ventricular output, the timing of atrial contraction with respect to ventricular contraction was varied. Atrioventricular (A-V) dissociation produced by right ventricular pacing was used to change continually the relationship of left atrial (LA) to left ventricular (LV) contraction. Measurements of each beat included mitral valve gradient, left ventricular ejection time (LVET), and left ventricular peak-systolic pressure (LVPSP). The diastolic gradient was used to calculate diastolic flow per beat after the area of the stenotic mitral orifice had been previously determined. Calculated diastolic flow increased significantly (24%) as did the parameters of left ventricular output, LVPSP and LVET (P < 0.005 for both), when atrial contraction was optimally timed. Cumulative effects were observed when a series of well-placed or poorly placed atrial contractions occurred. The method documents change in LV output which depends on appropriate timing of LA contraction that may not have been seen with a steady-state approach.


Key Words: A-V dissociation • Pacing • Atrial function




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
G Karthikeyan
The value of rhythm control in mitral stenosis.
Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1013 - 1016.
[Full Text] [PDF]