Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1970;41:II-172-II-177

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FALICOV, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by KITTLE, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FALICOV, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by KITTLE, C. F.

(Circulation. 1970;41:II-172.)
© 1970 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulatory Effects of Carotid Sinus Nerve Stimulation in Dogs with Reference to Coronary Flow and Resistance

RAUL E. FALICOV M.D.1; LEON RESNEKOV M.D., M.R.C.P.1; VLADIMIR KOCANDRLE M.D.1; SHEILA KING 1; C. FREDERICK KITTLE M.D.1

1 From the Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

The effects of electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus nerves upon heart rate, myocardial function, circulatory dynamics, and coronary flow were studied in the anesthetized, open-chest dog. Carotid sinus nerve stimulation produced a transient profound bradycardia, which was abolished by vagotomy, and a more sustained, less marked, slowing of the heart, which became less marked after propranolol. The effects on cardiac output were variable. Significant drops in aortic pressure and systemic resistance were observed. Anterior descending coronary arterial flow also decreased significantly, but the changes in calculated coronary vascular resistance were variable. A disproportionate reduction in coronary blood flow was observed relative to the decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption.

Under the conditions of our experiment, carotid sinus nerve stimulation significantly decreased cardiac work, arterial pressure, and myocardial contractility, and probably produced some coronary vasoconstriction secondary to the reduction in myocardial oxygen demand.