Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1971;43:145-153

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MURPHY, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by YU, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MURPHY, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by YU, P. N.

(Circulation. 1971;43:145.)
© 1971 American Heart Association, Inc.


Effects of Acute Digitalization on the Pulmonary Blood Volume in Patients with Heart Disease

GERALD W. MURPHY M.D.1; BERNARD F. SCHREINER JR. M.D.1; PAUL N. YU M.D.1

1 From the Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.

Basic hemodynamic data and the pulmonary blood volume (PBV) were determined in 23 patients before and after intravenous administration of acetyl strophanthidin during right and left heart catheterization. These patients were divided into two groups depending upon whether or not digitalization produced a significant fall in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVD). Group I consisted of 11 patients who manifested a significant decrease in LVD, while in group II no change was noted after digitalization. In both groups, a significant rise in LV stroke volume, stroke work, and maximal rate of rise of LV systolic pressure (dp/dt) was recorded. In group I, a significant decrease in the pulmonary vascular distending pressure (Pd) was accompanied by a decrease in PBV. In contrast, no change in Pd or PBV was noted in the patients in group II. Changes in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were inconsistent. It is concluded that: (1) in patients of group I the concordant decrease in Pd and PBV represented a passive effect on the pulmonary vascular bed mediated by improved LV performance and decrease in LVD; (2) in patients of group II, despite evidence of significant positive inotropic effects on the left ventricle, the failure of LVD to fall prevented a decrease in Pd and PBV; (3) no evidence of active vasomotor effects of acetyl strophanthidin in the lung could be demonstrated. Changes in PVR were capricious and not apparently useful in assessment of the presence or absence of pulmonary vasomotor effects induced by digitalis. The results of this study differ from the findings of other investigators in cardiac patients and experimental animals. Some of the differences may be attributed to different experimental methods and to species variation in vascular reactivity.

Also, the findings in this report contrast with those previously reported for isoproterenol and aminophylline, agents that produce both positive inotropic effects on the heart and active vasomotion in the pulmonary circulation.


Key Words: Ventricular function • Pulmonary vasomotor effects • Mitral valve • Aortic valve

Submitted on June 19, 1970
Accepted on September 25, 1970