Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1971;44:575-584

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FORTUIN, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by CRAIGE, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FORTUIN, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by CRAIGE, E.

(Circulation. 1971;44:575.)
© 1971 American Heart Association, Inc.


Determination of Left Ventricular Volumes by Ultrasound

NICHOLAS J. FORTUIN M.D.1; WILLIAM P. HOOD JR. M.D.1; M. EUGENE SHERMAN M.D.1; ERNEST CRAIGE M.D.1

1 From the Medical Research Branch, Division of Health Effects Research, Air Pollution Control Office, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, and the C. V. Richardson Laboratory, North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514.

We compared dimensions of the left ventricular minor axis (S) measured at enddiastole (SD) and end-systole (SS) by echocardiography with dimensions and left ventricular volumes measured by biplane angiocardiography in 27 patients with diverse cardiac abnormalities. There were high correlations between echographic and angiographic ventricular minor-axis dimensions (r = 0.85 for SD and 0.87 for SS), between echographic dimensions and ventricular volumes (r = 0.84 for end-systolic volume [ESV] and SS, 0.83 for end-diastolic volume [EDV] and SD), and between the relative change in the echographic minor axis with systole (% Dgr S) and ejection fraction (r = 0.79). Regression formulae were derived from these relationships which allowed calculation of ventricular volumes from echo dimensions alone: ESV = 47 SD—120, EDV = 59 SD—153. These equations allowed relatively accurate prediction of volumes over a wide range of ventricular sizes. The use of a cube function of the echographic minor axis was an accurate predictor of volumes only in smaller ventricular chambers, but overestimated volumes in larger hearts.


Key Words: Angiocardiography • Minor-axis dimensions • Left ventricular geometry • Ejection fraction • Noninvasive techniques • Echocardiography

Submitted on March 23, 1971
Accepted on June 4, 1971




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
G. C. Timmis, S. Gordon, R. G. Ramos, and V. Gangadharan
The Relative Resistance of Normal Young Women to Ethanol-Induced Myocardial Depression
Angiology, January 1, 1979; 30(11): 733 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]