This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BRODER, M. I. Articles by COHN, J. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by BRODER, M. I. Articles by COHN, J. N.

(Circulation. 1972;46:731.)
© 1972 American Heart Association, Inc.

---

Evolution of Abnormalities in Left Ventricular Function after Acute Myocardial Infarction

MARTIN I. BRODER M.D.¹ JAY N. COHN M.D.¹

¹ From the Hypertension and Clinical Hemodynamics Section, Veterans Administration Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D. C.

Twelve patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were studied by left ventricular (LV) catheterization, echocardiography, and volume manipulation (tourniquets, phlebotomy, and dextran infusion) within 24 hours of infarction (study 1) and 3 weeks later (study 2). Three patients also were studied 6-10 months later (study 3). Cardiac index rose (from 2.50 to 3.15 liters/min/m²) and right atrial pressure fell (from 9.4 to 5.3 mm Hg) from study 1 to study 2. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) remained elevated (21.8 mm Hg at study 1 and 20.9 mm Hg at study 2) and was actually higher at study 2 in six patients who were otherwise improved. At study 1, end-diastolic ventricular diameter was within normal limits in five patients with clinical LV failure, four of whom had grossly elevated LVEDP. At study 2, ventricular diameter remained normal in three patients with elevated LVEDP but no LV failure. At study 3, LVEDP was still elevated in two patients and chamber diameter normal in two and slightly increased in one. Ventricular function curves (LVEDP vs stroke index) constructed from results during volume manipulation showed no consistent improvement during convalescence.

These data indicate that clinical improvement after AMI is not usually associated with a fall in LVEDP or a normalization of the impaired LV function curve. Normal ventricular diameter indicates normal ventricular volume which, in the presence of an elevated LVEDP, suggests a persistent decrease in LV compliance.

Key Words: Ventricular compliance • Echocardiography • Ventricular volume • Ventricular function curves

Submitted on January 25, 1972
Accepted on May 15, 1972

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Goldstein Pathophysiology and management of right heart ischemia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2002; 40(5): 841 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Bowers, W. W. O'Neill, C. Grines, M. C. Pica, R. D. Safian, and J. A. Goldstein Effect of Reperfusion on Biventricular Function and Survival after Right Ventricular Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., April 2, 1998; 338(14): 933 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Franciosa Outflow Resistance as a Regulator of Left Ventricular Performance Angiology, May 1, 1978; 29(5): 393 - 401. [PDF]