Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1972;46:761-769

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MANDEL, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by KERMAIER, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MANDEL, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by KERMAIER, A. I.

(Circulation. 1972;46:761.)
© 1972 American Heart Association, Inc.


Assessment of Sinus Node Function in Patients with the Sick Sinus Syndrome

WILLIAM J. MANDEL M.D.1; HIROKAZU HAYAKAWA M.D.1; HOWARD N. ALLEN M.D.1; RONALD DANZIG M.D.1; ALAN I. KERMAIER M.D.1

1 From the Department of Cardiology, Cedars of Lebanon Hospital and the Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Thirty-one patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction were evaluated with electrocardiograms, Holter monitor recordings, exercise, isoproterenol infusions, atropine administration, Valsalva maneuvers, carotid sinus massage, and overdrive pacing. Four basic clinical subsets were recognized: (1) carotid sinus hypersensitivity (2) bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, (3) episodic sinus arrest, and (4) persistent symptomatic sinus bradycardia. The study group demonstrated a normal heart rate response to exercise and isoproterenol infusion (%Dgr = +95 exercise, +144 isoproterenol) in the face of diminished responsiveness to atropine administration (%Dgr = +23). Marked carotid sinus hypersensitivity was demonstrated in eight patients, and four patients demonstrated slight abnormalities during performance of Valsalva maneuvers. Significant suppression of sinus node dysfunction was observed following atrial overdrive in the study group (postpacing pause = 3087 ± 464 msec) as compared to patients without significant sinus node function (postpacing pause = 1073 ± 63 msec) (P < 0.001). In patients with intact V-A conduction, ventricular overdrive also resulted in sinus node suppression (postpacing pause = 1901 ± 357 msec). There was a marked decrease in the degree of sinus node depression following atropine administration. Ten of 31 patients demonstrated various degrees of A-V block following atrial pacing at rates less than 100 beats/min.

It is concluded that the present methods of evaluation of sinus function, especially sinus node recovery time following overdrive pacing, may prove of value in the investigation of patients with syncope of unknown etiology.


Key Words: Isoproterenol • Overdrive pacing • Atropine • Valsalva maneuver • Carotid sinus massage

Submitted on January 31, 1972
Accepted on June 5, 1972




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Ishikawa, S. Sumita, K. Kimura, M. Kikuchi, M. Kosuge, T. Endo, T. Sugano, T. Sigemasa, T. Usui, and S. Umemura
Sinus node recovery time assessment by the overdrive suppression test employing an intravenous injection of disopyramide phosphate
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 54 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
Y. He-Chang
The Provocative Test and Their Diagnostic Value in Sinus Node Failure
Angiology, August 1, 1984; 35(8): 480 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
L. Gould and C.V. R. Reddy
Failure of Cardiac Conduction Studies To Detect the Sick Sinus Syndrome
Angiology, June 1, 1975; 26(6): 467 - 470.
[PDF]