Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1972;46:770-779

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAHIMTOOLA, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by GUNNAR, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RAHIMTOOLA, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by GUNNAR, R. M.

(Circulation. 1972;46:770.)
© 1972 American Heart Association, Inc.


Changes in Left Ventricular Performance from Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction to the Convalescent Phase

SHAHBUDIN H. RAHIMTOOLA M.B., F.R.C.P.1; MICHAEL M. DIGILIO M.D.1; ALI EHSANI M.D.1; HENRY S. LOEB M.D.1; KENNETH M. ROSEN M.D.1; ROLF M. GUNNAR M.D.1

1 From the Department of Adult Cardiology, Division of Medicine, and the Hektoen Institute for Medical Research of the Cook County Hospital, Department of Medicine, Abraham Lincoln School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Left ventricular performance was assessed in 22 patients early (within the first 2 days) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and again during the convalescent phase (3-5 weeks later). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) fell from the early to the late study by an average of 10.7 mm Hg in the 12 (55%) group A patients. In these patients, cardiac index (CI) and left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) increased by an average of 0.65 liters/min/m2 and 63.8 g-m, respectively, and the mean right atrial pressure fell by 2.4 mm Hg. These changes were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Left ventricular (LV) function was improved in this group of patients.

LVEDP increased in the other 10 patients and they were subdivided into groups B and C depending on whether CI increased or decreased. In six patients (27%), LVEDP increased by 5 mm Hg and CI increased by 0.4 liters/min/m2 (group B); the P value for these changes was < 0.05. Group B patients also had an increase of mean arterial pressure and left ventricular ejection time, and thus the alterations in LVEDP and CI could have resulted from an increase of arterial pressure. In four patients (18%), LVEDP increased by 11.5 mm Hg, CI decreased by 0.9 liter/min/m2, and LVSW was reduced by 34.5 g-m (group C). Although the decreases of CI and LVSW were not statistically significant in group C patients, LV function had deteriorated. In the follow-up period, three of the four patients in group C died and the fourth patient is in functional class IV.

Therefore, in the convalescent period ventricular function had improved in 55%, and had deteriorated in 18% of cases. The changes in LV function could not have been predicted on the basis of the clinical features, systolic time intervals, or the initial hemodynamic findings. Patients whose ventricular function deteriorated during convalescence had a very poor prognosis.


Key Words: Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure • Ventricular function • Gallop heart sounds • Systolic time intervals • Cardiac output

Submitted on April 24, 1972
Accepted on June 5, 1972




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
J T Walsh, P D Batin, M Hawkins, D McEntegart, and A J Cowley
Ventricular dilatation in the absence of ACE inhibitors: influence of haemodynamic and neurohormonal variables following myocardial infarction
Heart, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 33 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text]