Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1973;47:325-330

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AGHA, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by MYERBURG, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by AGHA, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by MYERBURG, R. J.

(Circulation. 1973;47:325.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.


Type I, Type II, and Type III Gaps in Bundle-Branch Conduction

ABDUL S. AGHA M.D.1; AGUSTIN CASTELLANOS JR. M.D.1; DAVID WELLS M.D.1; MELVIN D. ROSS M.D.1; BENJAMIN BEFELER M.D.1; ROBERT J. MYERBURG M.D.1

1 From the Cardiology Section, Veterans Administration Hospital and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

"Gaps" in bundle-branch conduction were observed in three patients using the combined technic of premature atrial stimulation and His bundle recordings.

In type I gap a complete LBBB pattern disappeared at shorter coupling intervals because the premature atrial impulses encountered enough delay at the A-V node to reach the left bundle branch after the end of its effective refractory period. When this occurred, the H1-H2 intervals were longer and the H2-V2 intervals shorter than that at which complete LBBB had been present.

In type II gap a complete RBBB pattern disappeared at shorter coupling intervals because the premature atrial impulses were so delayed within the proximal His-Purkinje system that they reached the right bundle branch after the end of its effective refractory period. When this occurred the H1-H2 intervals were shorter and the H2-V2 longer than that at which complete RBBB had been present.

In the patient with type III gap and complete LBBB, conduction to the ventricles through the right branch failed at long coupling intervals but was resumed at shorter coupling intervals while the H1-H2 intervals were shorter, and the H2-V2 intervals similar, to those at which block had occurred. True supernormal conduction was excluded in the first two cases. Nevertheless, this phenomenon, as well as a longitudinal dissociation, varying pulsatile vagal discharges acting on an area of depressed conductivity, and phase 4 diastolic depolarization in the right branch coexisting with complete block in the left branch, could have been responsible for type III gap.


Key Words: Complete bundle-branch block • Atrial stimulation • His bundle recordings

Submitted on July 19, 1972
Accepted on October 6, 1972