Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1973;48:118-124

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRANCIOSA, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by CONWAY, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FRANCIOSA, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by CONWAY, J.

(Circulation. 1973;48:118.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.


Antihypertensive and Hemodynamic Properties of the New Beta Adrenergic Blocking Agent Timolol

JOSEPH A. FRANCIOSA M.D.1; EDWARD D. FREIS M.D.1; JAMES CONWAY M.D.1

1 From the Veterans Administration Hospital and the Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D. C.

The antihypertensive activity of timolol, a new beta adrenergic blocking agent, was assessed in hypertensive patients. In hospitalized patients timolol, 5 mg orally every 8 hr for one week, resulted in a significant although mild reduction of blood pressure with diastolic pressure falling from a mean of 101 mm Hg to 91 mm Hg. Heart rate and cardiac output fell while total peripheral resistance increased. The Valsalva response, the reflex tachycardia following inhalation of amyl nitrite and the cardiovascular responses to infusion of isoproterenol were significantly inhibited. Timolol also was compared to propranolol in a randomized double-blind outpatient trial. The antihypertensive and bradycrotic effects of the two drugs were similar. Heart rate was reduced 18% by both drugs (P < 0.05). Supine diastolic pressure fell 9% (P < 0.05). Unlike the short term effects of timolol, and in contrast to propranolol, cardiac output did not remain reduced after five weeks of continuous treatment with timolol. It is concluded that timolol merits further investigation as an antihypertensive agent.


Key Words: Hypertension • Propranolol • Sympathetic blockade • Amyl nitrite

Submitted on December 21, 1972
Accepted on February 16, 1973