Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1973;48:III-51-III-55

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEPLEY, D.
Right arrow Articles by TECTOR, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LEPLEY, D., JR.
Right arrow Articles by TECTOR, A. J.

(Circulation. 1973;48:III-51.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.


Experience with the Björk-Shiley Prosthetic Valve

DERWARD LEPLEY JR. M.D.1; CHARLES F. REUBEN M.D.1; ROBERT J. FLEMMA M.D.1; JOHN H. HUSTON M.D.1; JOHN C. MANLEY M.D.1; JAMES F. HOFFMAN M.D.1; ALFRED J. TECTOR M.D.1

1 From The Medical College of Wisconsin and St. Luke's Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

One hundred and eighty-nine patients who had valvular replacement with 213 Björk-Shiley prosthetic heart valves are presented who are 6 months to 2frac12 years postoperative. Surgical mortality was 2.6% in mitral valve replacement and 8.8% in aortic valve replacement. The late mortality for the entire series was 2.9%. Four patients had episodes of embolization, all from mitral prostheses. Only two incidences of paraprosthetic leaks were noted in patients with mitral valves, and none in patients with valves in the aortic position. The authors believe this prosthesis to be superior in its hemodynamic characteristics and wear durability, with few late complications.


Key Words: Pressure gradient • Anticoagulation • Saphenous vein bypass grafts