Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1973;48:III-99-III-104

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DILLEY, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by BERNSTEIN, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DILLEY, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by BERNSTEIN, E. F.

(Circulation. 1973;48:III-99.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.


Serial Hemodynamics During Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation for Cardiogenic Shock

RALPH B. DILLEY M.D.1; JOHN ROSS JR. M.D.1; EUGENE F. BERNSTEIN M.D., PH.D.1

1 From the Departments of Surgery and Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.

The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) has achieved some success in the treatment of cardiogenic shock, but there has been little objective documentation of the serial hemodynamic effects of counterpulsation in man. Six patients who satisfied strict criteria for refractory cardiogenic shock were treated with IABC. The following determinations were made serially: systemic blood pressure (BP), pulmonary artery pressures (PAP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAW), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), and A-VO2 difference. The average duration of balloon assist was 5.8 days (range 1.5 to 21 days). There was immediate improvement in all patients in that pressors could be maintained at lower levels. Although mean systolic BP did not change significantly from control values, augmented diastolic BP was maintained between 112 and 120 mm Hg. Initially, there were significant decreases in mean PAP (–13.4 mm Hg, P < 0.02), mean PAW (–10 mm Hg, P < 0.01), and A-VO2 difference (–2.12 ml/100 ml) and increases in CI (+ 1.02 L/min/m2, P < 0.05). The improvement in diastolic BP, CI, and A-VO2 difference persisted in each patient, but mean PAP increased from 22.6 to 32.3 mm Hg (P < 0.05) and mean PAW from 14.4 to 22 mm Hg (P < 0.05) by the fourth day of IABC. We conclude that IABC causes marked immediate improvement in hemodynamic variables and that prolonged survival is possible. However, progressive elevation of mean PAP and PAW, reflecting deterioration of left ventricular function, occurs and can prohibit a successful outcome with IABC alone.


Key Words: Myocardial infarction