Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1973;48:581-587

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KIELY, J.
Right arrow Articles by PITT, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KIELY, J.
Right arrow Articles by PITT, B.

(Circulation. 1973;48:581.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.


The Role of Furosemide in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Associated with Acute Myocardial Infarction

JOHN KIELY M.D.1; DAVID T. KELLY M.B.1; DEAN R. TAYLOR M.D.1; BERTRAM PITT M.D.1

1 From the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Fifteen patients with acute myocardial infarction and an elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were given 40 mg furosemide intravenously within 24 hr of diagnosis of infarction. We divided the patients into two groups on the basis of the diuretic response to furosemide: nine who responded with a diuresis of greater than 400 ml in two hours, and six with a lower diuresis. The nine patients who responded well had a 35% fall in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, from 21 to 12 mm Hg (P < 0.01), accompanied by a small but significant decrease in arterial pressure at the end of two hours. There was no apparent increase in left ventricular function in these patients as shown by the relationship of left ventricular filling pressure and stroke work index, but all survived. The nonresponders failed to show significant hemodynamic changes, were significantly older, had a higher serum urea nitrogen (SUN) than the responders and had higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Despite further therapy with much higher doses of furosemide and digitalis, five of the six nonresponders (83%) died. Furosemide is of value in relieving pulmonary congestion in patients with moderate congestive heart failure associated with myocardial infarction. It should be given cautiously, as an initial dose of 40 mg intravenously may cause a large fall in cardiac output and systemic pressure in occasional patients. Furosemide cannot, however, be recommended as the primary therapeutic agent in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction.


Key Words: Diuretics

Submitted on January 18, 1973
Accepted on April 18, 1973




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
L. Gould, A.B. Chokshi, S. Patel, and G.I. Gomes
Electrophysiologic Properties of Furosemide in Man
Angiology, January 1, 1983; 34(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. Koob and K. Prasad
Acute Effects of Furosemide on Blood Electrolytes and Hemodynamics in Dogs
Angiology, June 1, 1978; 29(6): 463 - 472.
[Abstract] [PDF]